IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i23p15591-d982500.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Toolkit for Co-Designing towards Community-Based Active Ageing: Lessons Learned during Development

Author

Listed:
  • Gubing Wang

    (Department of Built Environment, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands)

  • Dena Kasraian

    (Department of Built Environment, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands)

  • Carlijn Valk

    (Department of Industrial Design, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands)

  • Yuan Lu

    (Department of Industrial Design, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands)

  • William Hurst

    (Department of Informational Technology, Wageningen University and Research, 6706KN Wageningen, The Netherlands)

  • Marielle Jambroes

    (Department of Public Health, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584CX Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Pieter van Wesemael

    (Department of Built Environment, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands)

Abstract

It is increasingly recognized that community-based interventions for active ageing are more lasting and effective, yet the tools and methods for developing these interventions are lacking. This study investigates how to co-design community-based active ageing with older adults via the development of a toolkit to support this goal. Rapid reviews were conducted to understand (i) the effective behavioural change techniques for older adults, (ii) how to co-design with older adults for community-based interventions, and (iii) how to design tools for behaviour change that are easy to use. These reviews served as the foundation for developing a toolkit to support the co-design of community-based active ageing, which was evaluated during an interdisciplinary hackathon with older adults. Quantitative data from the surveys suggested that the confidence levels of students in developing interventions for health behaviour change and in co-designing with older adults increased after the hackathon, and the enjoyment of participating in the hackathon and of using the toolkit were statistically significant factors influencing this increase. Qualitative data from interviews and observations revealed how the toolkit was (un)used by the participants and what aspects of the toolkit can be improved. We encourage future researchers and practitioners to apply and adapt our research findings to the communities of older adults that they are working with.

Suggested Citation

  • Gubing Wang & Dena Kasraian & Carlijn Valk & Yuan Lu & William Hurst & Marielle Jambroes & Pieter van Wesemael, 2022. "A Toolkit for Co-Designing towards Community-Based Active Ageing: Lessons Learned during Development," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-21, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15591-:d:982500
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15591/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15591/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Axon, Stephen, 2016. "“The Good Life”: Engaging the public with community-based carbon reduction strategies," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 82-92.
    2. Sonja Pedell & Ann Borda & Alen Keirnan & Nicole Aimers, 2021. "Combining the Digital, Social and Physical Layer to Create Age-Friendly Cities and Communities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-14, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhiyu Feng & Longfei Li & Jingchun Zhang & Xinqun Feng, 2024. "Towards a Communication Ecology in the Life of Rural Senior Citizens: How Rural Public Spaces Influence Community Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Lu Zhang & Shuang Zhao & Li Cui & Lin Wu, 2020. "Exploring Green Innovation Practices: Content Analysis of the Fortune Global 500 Companies," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440209, March.
    3. Belinda Paulovich & Sonja Pedell & Erica Tandori & Jeanie Beh, 2022. "Weaving Social Connectivity into the Community Fabric: Exploring Older Adult’s Relationships to Technology and Place," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-13, July.
    4. Joost van Hoof & Hannah R. Marston, 2021. "Age-Friendly Cities and Communities: State of the Art and Future Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-13, February.
    5. Atsushi Watabe & Alice Marie Yamabe-Ledoux, 2023. "Low-Carbon Lifestyles beyond Decarbonisation: Toward a More Creative Use of the Carbon Footprinting Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-28, March.
    6. Ying Yan Tan & Rosmini Omar, 2022. "Green Practices and Innovations of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) Industry in Singapore: Idea Worth Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-38, September.
    7. Chengmin Zhou & Ting Huang & Xin Luo & Jake Kaner & Xiaoman Fu, 2022. "Recognition and Analysis of an Age-Friendly Intelligent Sofa Design Based on Skeletal Key-Points," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-21, September.
    8. Spanou, Elisavet & Kenter, Jasper O. & Graziano, Marcello, 2020. "The Effects of Aquaculture and Marine Conservation on Cultural Ecosystem Services: An Integrated Hedonic – Eudaemonic Approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    9. Tianrong Xu & Nikmatul Adha Nordin & Ainoriza Mohd Aini, 2022. "Urban Green Space and Subjective Well-Being of Older People: A Systematic Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-29, October.
    10. Chunmei Zhang & Jun Yang, 2023. "Evaluation of the Quality of the Age-Friendly Environment in Liaoning Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-13, November.
    11. Chen Liu & Alice Marie Yamabe-Ledoux, 2023. "Challenges in Achieving 1.5-Degree Lifestyle Mitigation Options—Insights from a Citizen-Participatory Household Experiment in Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-27, August.
    12. Frits Meijer & Ad Straub & Erwin Mlecnik, 2018. "Consultancy Centres and Pop-Ups as Local Authority Policy Instruments to Stimulate Adoption of Energy Efficiency by Homeowners," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-14, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15591-:d:982500. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.