IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i22p15137-d974962.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparison of 5v5 and 3x3 Men’s Basketball Regarding Shot Selection and Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Zoltan Boros

    (School of Doctoral Studies, Hungarian University of Sports Science, 1123 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Kata Toth

    (Sport Economics and Decision Making Research Centre, Hungarian University of Sports Science, 1123 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Gergely Csurilla

    (Sport Economics and Decision Making Research Centre, Hungarian University of Sports Science, 1123 Budapest, Hungary
    Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, 1097 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Tamas Sterbenz

    (Sport Economics and Decision Making Research Centre, Hungarian University of Sports Science, 1123 Budapest, Hungary)

Abstract

Background: Both in 5v5 and 3x3 basketball, the goal of the players is to score more points than the opponent. However, the differences in rules between two basketball disciplines can affect thinking, behaviour, and decisions of the players. A core difference between two disciplines is the value of the shots. In 5v5, long-range shots are worth three points and close-range two, while in 3x3, their values are two and one points, respectively. As the value ratio of the close and long-range shots is greater in 3x3, we assume that players make different decisions about their shot selection in 3x3 than in 5v5, which can affect offensive efficiency. Methods: We analysed game statistics of the 2019 men’s 5v5 and 3x3 Basketball World Cups. Besides regular statistical indicators, we applied relative offensive rating to be able to compare the two disciplines. Results: The analysis of relative offensive rating showed that offences are more effective in 5v5 than in 3x3. We also found significant difference in shot selection and efficiency. In 3x3, there is a higher proportion of the shots than in 5v5, but long-range shots are more successful in 5v5. Conclusions: For rule differences that affect player’s shot selection and affect offensive efficiency, their decisions are characterized by ecological dynamics and naturalistic decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Zoltan Boros & Kata Toth & Gergely Csurilla & Tamas Sterbenz, 2022. "A Comparison of 5v5 and 3x3 Men’s Basketball Regarding Shot Selection and Efficiency," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-12, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:15137-:d:974962
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/15137/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/15137/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gabor Csataljay & Peter O’Donoghue & Mike Hughes & Henriette Dancs, 2009. "Performance indicators that distinguish winning and losing teams in basketball," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 60-66, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lorenzo Gasperi & Daniele Conte & Anthony Leicht & Miguel-Ángel Gómez-Ruano, 2020. "Game Related Statistics Discriminate National and Foreign Players According to Playing Position and Team Ability in the Women’s Basketball EuroLeague," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-10, July.
    2. Assanskiy, Artur & Shaposhnikov, Daniil & Tylkin, Igor & Vasiliev, Gleb, 2022. "Prove them wrong: Do professional athletes perform better when facing their former clubs?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    3. Zsombor Zilinyi & Ágoston Nagy & Szilvia Borbély & Tamás Sterbenz, 2022. "Bounded Rationality and Heuristics: Do We Only Need to Score in Order to Win Individual Awards in Basketball?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-9, February.
    4. Radivoj Mandić & Saša Jakovljević & Frane Erčulj & Erik Štrumbelj, 2019. "Trends in NBA and Euroleague basketball: Analysis and comparison of statistical data from 2000 to 2017," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, October.
    5. Tomasz Zając & Kazimierz Mikołajec & Paweł Chmura & Marek Konefał & Michał Krzysztofik & Piotr Makar, 2023. "Long-Term Trends in Shooting Performance in the NBA: An Analysis of Two- and Three-Point Shooting across 40 Consecutive Seasons," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-12, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:15137-:d:974962. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.