IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i21p13961-d954673.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Quality Reviews Play a Role during the Implementation of Health Sciences Programmes? A Document Analysis Study

Author

Listed:
  • Charity Ngoatle

    (Department of Nursing Sciences, University of Limpopo, Polokwane 0700, South Africa)

  • Tebogo M. Mothiba

    (Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Limpopo, Polokwane 0700, South Africa)

  • Modikana A. Ngoepe

    (Quality Assurance Unit, University of Limpopo, Polokwane 0700, South Africa)

Abstract

Background: A programme review is a process that assesses the status, efficacy, and advancement of academic programmes and aids in determining their future needs, priorities, and direction. The purpose of the academic programme review is to demonstrate that the programmehas appropriate quality assurance processes and procedures in place in accordance with the applicable established criteria and to offer ongoing guidance for the development of academic programmes to ensure that they remain responsive and relevant. The study, therefore, sought to investigate the role of quality reviews during the implementation of health sciences programmes at a rural University in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Methods: Data were collected using the document analysis review technique to assess the Self-Evaluation Review reports for three programmes in the faculty of health sciences. The study’s descriptive qualitative data were analysed using a thematic analysis approach in six stages. All-inclusive purposive sampling was used to select the documents for review. Results: Three health sciences programmes were reviewed; two of the programmes met the minimum standards whereas one needed improvement. The review showed inadequate staffing, poor student support, and inadequate marketing of the programmes among others. Conclusions: The study has shown that conducting a review is crucial for maintaining and enhancing quality provisioning of programmes. The quality gaps identified by the panellists while reviewing the programmes can be used to improve and enhance quality of the programmes to a higher level if properly implemented. Thus, quality review does play a significant role during the implementation of health sciences programmes.

Suggested Citation

  • Charity Ngoatle & Tebogo M. Mothiba & Modikana A. Ngoepe, 2022. "Do Quality Reviews Play a Role during the Implementation of Health Sciences Programmes? A Document Analysis Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-17, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:13961-:d:954673
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/13961/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/13961/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baraka Manjale Ngussa & Lazarus Ndiku Makewa, 2014. "Student Voice in Curriculum Change: A Theoretical Reasoning," International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, vol. 3(3), pages 23-37, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:13961-:d:954673. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.