IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i20p13397-d944875.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Virtual Healthcare in Rural and Remote Settings: A Qualitative Study of Canadian Rural Family Physicians’ Experiences during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Nahid Rahimipour Anaraki

    (Centre for Rural Health Studies, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL A1B 3V6, Canada)

  • Meghraj Mukhopadhyay

    (Centre for Rural Health Studies, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL A1B 3V6, Canada)

  • Margo Wilson

    (Discipline of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL A1B 3V6, Canada)

  • Yordan Karaivanov

    (Labrador-Grenfell Health, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL A1B 3V6, Canada)

  • Shabnam Asghari

    (Centre for Rural Health Studies, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL A1B 3V6, Canada)

Abstract

Objective: This paper aims to explore the experiences of rural family physicians using virtual healthcare in their clinical practice during the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada. Design: A community-based participatory approach. Setting: Rural and remote communities in Canada. Participants: Thirteen rural family physicians with at least one year of clinical experience. Results: The data illustrate significant issues associated with virtual healthcare in rural healthcare. The adoption of virtual healthcare has been expressed to pose a harsh polarity; the benefit conferred to rural family physicians with the opportunity to have flexible working hours and work at home while interacting with family members is starkly contrasted with the struggles of insufficient financial support to facilitate setting up virtual healthcare for rural physicians, unreliable technological infrastructure, and inadequate technological resources, which are all exacerbated by the lack of adequate health literacy in rural communities. Results were compiled into five major categories underpinning the lived experiences of rural family physicians: 1—potential trade-off between convenience and quality of care; 2—work–family boundaries; 3—patient-doctor communication; 4—technology as barrier or enabler; 5—increased call duration. Conclusion: The differing trends assessed in the findings illustrate the complications faced in providing virtual healthcare, which resonates with the experiences and views of rural physicians. The findings of this study may guide the development of tailored technologies that adjust for the complexity of administering virtual healthcare in rural communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Nahid Rahimipour Anaraki & Meghraj Mukhopadhyay & Margo Wilson & Yordan Karaivanov & Shabnam Asghari, 2022. "Virtual Healthcare in Rural and Remote Settings: A Qualitative Study of Canadian Rural Family Physicians’ Experiences during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-11, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13397-:d:944875
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13397/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13397/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rudschies, Catharina & Schneider, Ingrid, 2024. "Ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) of virtual agents and virtual reality in healthcare," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13397-:d:944875. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.