IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i20p13027-d938811.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Use by Rural–Urban Residence among Women in Nigeria, 2016–2018

Author

Listed:
  • Otobo I. Ujah

    (College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USA)

  • Russell S. Kirby

    (College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USA)

Abstract

This study examined temporal trends in the association between rural–urban residence and the use of LARCs among women using a method of contraception. A secondary objective was to examine whether the association varied over time. This study was a secondary analysis of data collected by the Performance Monitoring for Action (PMA) project from Nigeria among women aged 15–49 in 2016 ( N = 11,054), 2017 ( N = 11,380), and 2018 ( N = 11,106). Weighted multivariable logistic regression analyses examined the association between place of residence and the likelihood of LARC (overall and specific type) utilization. Using weighted multivariable logistic regression, we show that, of the 6488 women who were using a method of contraception, the rates of LARC utilization in urban areas were significantly lower than in rural areas (OR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.38–0.73), attributed mainly to the high utilization rates of implants. Women in urban areas were more likely to use intrauterine devices (IUDs) (OR = 1.90, 95% CI 1.09–3.30) compared to those in rural areas. Conversely, the use of implants was significantly lower among women in urban areas (OR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.28–0.54). Adjusting for all predictors, we observed a reduction, albeit not significantly different, in odds in overall LARC, IUD, and implant use in urban compared to rural areas. The use of LARCs increased between 2016 and 2018 and the association between LARC use and place of residence also differed by the PMA survey year. There is a need for programs and policies to close gaps in the disparities in overall and specific LARC utilization rates based on place of residence.

Suggested Citation

  • Otobo I. Ujah & Russell S. Kirby, 2022. "Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Use by Rural–Urban Residence among Women in Nigeria, 2016–2018," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-13, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13027-:d:938811
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13027/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13027/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John B. Casterline & John Bongaarts & Amy O. Tsui & Win Brown & Qingfeng Li, 2017. "Contraceptive Practice in sub-Saharan Africa," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 43, pages 166-191, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bright Opoku Ahinkorah & John Elvis Hagan Jr. & Abdul-Aziz Seidu & Francis Sambah & Faustina Adoboi & Thomas Schack & Eugene Budu, 2020. "Female adolescents’ reproductive health decision-making capacity and contraceptive use in sub-Saharan Africa: What does the future hold?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Asantesana Kamuyango & Wen-Hsuan Hou & Chung-Yi Li, 2020. "Trends and Contributing Factors to Contraceptive Use in Kenya: A Large Population-Based Survey 1989 to 2014," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-12, September.
    3. Stephanie Wiafe & Ariana Mihan & Colleen M. Davison, 2021. "Neighborhood-Level Influences and Adolescent Health Risk Behaviors in Rural and Urban Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-28, July.
    4. Konte, Maty & Osei Kwadwo, Victor & Zinyemba, Tatenda, 2019. "Women's political and reproductive health empowerment in Africa: A literature review," MERIT Working Papers 2019-044, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    5. Florianne C. J. Verkroost & Christiaan W. S. Monden, 2022. "Childlessness and Development in Sub-Saharan Africa: Is There Evidence for a U-shaped Pattern?," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 38(3), pages 319-352, August.
    6. Charity C Mazuba & Kefiloe A Maboe & Annalie D H Botha, 2020. "Sexual Activity, Knowledge of Contraceptives Use among Females Choosing Termination of Pregnancy at a Provincial Clinic in South Africa," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(1), pages 1-60, January.
    7. Ugochinyere J. Njoga & Ishmael F. Jaja & Osita S. Onwuka & Stanley U. Ilo & Ifeanyi G. Eke & Kenneth O. Abah & Chike F. Oguejiofor & Izuchukwu S. Ochiogu, 2022. "Reproductive Effects of Medicinal Plant ( Azadirachta indica ) Used as Forage and for Ethnoveterinary Practices: New Insights from Animal Models," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-18, August.
    8. Arif Ahmed & Mohammad S. Zahangir, 2019. "The Impact of Education and Residence on Current Use of Contraception in Ethiopian Women," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(9), pages 182-182, August.
    9. Brian C. Thiede & Matthew Hancock & Ahmed Kodouda & James Piazza, 2020. "Exposure to Armed Conflict and Fertility in Sub-Saharan Africa," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 57(6), pages 2113-2141, December.
    10. Mathias Lerch & Thomas Spoorenberg, 2020. "The emergence of birth limitation as a new stage in the fertility transition in sub-Saharan Africa," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 42(30), pages 827-858.
    11. Michael Ekholuenetale & Olah Uloko Owobi & Benedict Terfa Shishi, 2022. "Socioeconomic Position in Modern Contraceptive Uptake and Fertility Rate among Women of Childbearing Age in 37 Sub-Saharan Countries," World, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-18, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13027-:d:938811. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.