IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i19p12675-d932971.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Chemical and Biological Methods of Filtering Cryptosporidia from Water

Author

Listed:
  • Monika Sučik

    (Department of Biology and Physiology, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice, Komenského 73, 041 81 Košice, Slovakia)

  • Alexandra Valenčáková

    (Department of Biology and Physiology, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice, Komenského 73, 041 81 Košice, Slovakia)

Abstract

Despite the fact that Cryptosporidium spp. is a parasite which commonly causes diarrhea, it still receives little attention. In our experiment, we focused on comparing the biological ( N. davidi shrimp) and physical (zeolite with different thicknesses) possibility of filtering cryptosporidia from a small volume of water, which could contribute to increasing the catchability of this parasite. We monitored the ability to capture oocysts of the parasite Cryptosporidium parvum , genotype IIaA11G2R1, found in water samples. We infected drinking water with feces with a known number of cryptosporidial oocysts. One gram of sample contained ±28 oocysts. We filtered eight water samples with different concentrations of oocysts (0.1–2 g of infected stool per 15 L of water) using zeolite with a particle thickness of 0.2–0.6 mm and 0–0.3 mm. This was followed by purification, centrifugation and isolation utilizing the isolation kit AmpliSens ® DNA - sorb - B , which is intended for stool. In total, 120 shrimp were divided into four aquariums (A, B, C, n = 30) including the control (K), while drinking water with the same parameters was infected with different concentrations of oocysts (A: 2.5 g, B: 2 g, C: 1 g of infected stool per 15 L of water). We took 10 individual shrimp and processed them in three time intervals (6 h, 12 h and 24 h). We processed them whole, and we isolated the DNA utilizing the isolation kit AmpliSens ® DNA - sorb - AM , which is intended for tissues. Detection was carried out by molecular methods, namely the Nested PCR targeting of the region of the GP60 gene (60 kD glycoprotein). Gel electrophoresis showed the presence of C. parvum in seven zeolite-filtered water samples, and the parasite was not found in the water sample with the lowest number of oocysts filtered through the smaller-particle zeolite. There were 67 C. parvum -positive shrimp. Whereas the most positive shrimp were identified at 12 h of sampling, the least were identified at the 24 h mark. No shrimp positive for C. parvum was found in the control group. By sequencing, we confirmed the presence of C. parvum , genotype IIaA11G2R1, in all positive samples. We thus proved that the filtration capabilities of zeolite and N. davidi can be used for the rapid diagnosis of the presence of protozoa in a small amount of studied water.

Suggested Citation

  • Monika Sučik & Alexandra Valenčáková, 2022. "Comparison of Chemical and Biological Methods of Filtering Cryptosporidia from Water," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-11, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12675-:d:932971
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12675/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12675/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alua Omarova & Kamshat Tussupova & Ronny Berndtsson & Marat Kalishev & Kulyash Sharapatova, 2018. "Protozoan Parasites in Drinking Water: A System Approach for Improved Water, Sanitation and Hygiene in Developing Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antonia Bruno & Giulia Agostinetto & Sara Fumagalli & Giulia Ghisleni & Anna Sandionigi, 2022. "It’s a Long Way to the Tap: Microbiome and DNA-Based Omics at the Core of Drinking Water Quality," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Shahira A. Ahmed & Panagiotis Karanis, 2020. "Cryptosporidium and Cryptosporidiosis: The Perspective from the Gulf Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-34, September.
    3. Alua Omarova & Kamshat Tussupova & Peder Hjorth & Marat Kalishev & Raushan Dosmagambetova, 2019. "Water Supply Challenges in Rural Areas: A Case Study from Central Kazakhstan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-14, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12675-:d:932971. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.