IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i19p12481-d930048.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Reduced Fire Risk Cigarettes Regulation on Residential Fire Incidents, Mortality and Health Service Utilisation in New South Wales, Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Nargess Ghassempour

    (School of Business, Western Sydney University, Parramatta, NSW 2150, Australia
    Rozetta Institute Group, The Rocks, NSW 2000, Australia)

  • Wadad Kathy Tannous

    (School of Business, Western Sydney University, Parramatta, NSW 2150, Australia
    Translational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW 2560, Australia)

  • Kingsley Emwinyore Agho

    (Translational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW 2560, Australia
    School of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia)

  • Gulay Avsar

    (School of Business, Western Sydney University, Parramatta, NSW 2150, Australia)

  • Lara Ann Harvey

    (Fall, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
    School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW 2033, Australia)

Abstract

Smoking materials are a common ignition source for residential fires. In Australia, reduced fire risk (RFR) cigarettes regulation was implemented in 2010. However, the impact of this regulation on residential fires is unknown. This paper examines the impact of the RFR cigarettes regulation on the severity and health outcomes of fire incidents in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, from 2005 to 2014. Fire department data from 2005 to 2014 were linked with ambulance, emergency department, hospital, outpatient burns clinic and mortality datasets for NSW. Negative binomial regression analysis was performed to assess the changes to fire incidents’ severity pre- and post-RFR cigarettes regulation. There was an 8% reduction in total fire incidents caused by smokers’ materials post-RFR cigarettes regulation. Smokers’ materials fire incidents that damaged both contents and structure of the building, where fire flames extended beyond the room of fire origin, with over AUD 1000 monetary damage loss, decreased by 18, 22 and 12%, respectively. RFR cigarettes regulation as a fire risk mitigation has positively impacted the residential fire incident outcomes. This provides support for regulation of fire risk protective measures and bestows some direction for other fire safety policies and regulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Nargess Ghassempour & Wadad Kathy Tannous & Kingsley Emwinyore Agho & Gulay Avsar & Lara Ann Harvey, 2022. "The Impact of Reduced Fire Risk Cigarettes Regulation on Residential Fire Incidents, Mortality and Health Service Utilisation in New South Wales, Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-14, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12481-:d:930048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12481/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12481/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nargess Ghassempour & W. Kathy Tannous & Gulay Avsar & Kingsley E. Agho & Lara A. Harvey, 2021. "Estimating the Total Number of Residential Fire-Related Incidents and Underreported Residential Fire Incidents in New South Wales, Australia by Using Linked Administrative Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Alpert, H.R. & Christiani, D.C. & Orav, E.J. & Dockery, D.W. & Connolly, G.N., 2014. "Effectiveness of the cigarette ignition propensity standard in preventing unintentional residential fires in Massachusetts," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 104(4), pages 56-61.
    3. Hillel R. Alpert & Carrie Carpenter & Gregory N. Connolly & Vaughan Rees & Geoffrey Ferris Wayne, 2005. "The Effect of the New York State Cigarette Fire Safety Standard on Ignition Propensity, Smoke Toxicity and the Consumer market," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt0mg5v7cp, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    4. Moin Uddin Ahmed & Wadad Kathy Tannous & Kingsley Emwinyore Agho & Frances Henshaw & Deborah Turner & David Simmons, 2021. "Prevalence and Burden of Diabetes-Related Foot Disease in New South Wales, Australia: Evidence from the 45 and Up Study Survey Data Linked with Health Services Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-25, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Samar Al-Hajj & Ediriweera Desapriya & Colleen Pawliuk & Len Garis & Ian Pike, 2022. "Interventions for Preventing Residential Fires in Vulnerable Neighbourhoods and Indigenous Communities: A Systematic Review of the Literature," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Sara Markowitz, 2014. "Where There'S Smoking, There'S Fire: The Effects Of Smoking Policies On The Incidence Of Fires In The Usa," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(11), pages 1353-1373, November.
    3. Samar Al-Hajj & Larry Thomas & Shelley Morris & Joseph Clare & Charles Jennings & Chris Biantoro & Len Garis & Ian Pike, 2023. "Community Fire Risk Reduction: Longitudinal Assessment for HomeSafe Fire Prevention Program in Canada," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(14), pages 1-18, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12481-:d:930048. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.