IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i17p10563-d896661.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender Differences in Associations between Biomechanical and Psychosocial Work Exposures and Age of Withdrawal from Paid Employment among Older Workers

Author

Listed:
  • Karina Undem

    (National Institute of Occupational Health, 0363 Oslo, Norway)

  • Taina Leinonen

    (Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, 00250 Helsinki, Finland)

  • Petter Kristensen

    (National Institute of Occupational Health, 0363 Oslo, Norway)

  • Suzanne L. Merkus

    (National Institute of Occupational Health, 0363 Oslo, Norway)

  • Rachel L. Hasting

    (National Institute of Occupational Health, 0363 Oslo, Norway)

  • Jon Michael Gran

    (Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Basal Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, 0372 Oslo, Norway)

  • Ingrid S. Mehlum

    (National Institute of Occupational Health, 0363 Oslo, Norway
    Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, 0450 Oslo, Norway)

Abstract

Background: Work exposures are known predictors of withdrawal from employment, but the associations between work exposures and withdrawal may vary with gender. This study evaluated gender differences in associations between biomechanical and psychosocial work exposures and age of withdrawal from paid employment among older workers in Norway. Methods: 77,558 men and 67,773 women (born 1949–1953) were followed from age 62 until withdrawal from paid employment or end of follow-up in 2016 (up to five years follow-up). Information about eight biomechanical and seven psychosocial exposures was obtained from a gender-specific job exposure matrix. Using Cox regression, the difference in mean estimated time until withdrawal between non-exposed and exposed was calculated for each gender and work exposure separately. Results: The largest gender difference was found for high psychological demands. Among men, the non-exposed withdrew earlier than the exposed (−3.66 months (95% CI: −4.04–−3.25 months)), and contrary among women (0.71 (0.28–1.10)), resulting in a gender difference of 4.37 (3.81–4.97) months. Gender differences were also found for monotonous work (4.12 (3.51–4.69) months), hands above shoulder height (2.41 (1.76–3.10) months), and high iso-strain (2.14 (1.38–2.95) months). Conclusions: There were observed gender differences in the associations between some biomechanical and psychosocial work exposures and mean age of withdrawal from paid employment among older workers. However, the results are likely affected by the selection of who remains in the workforce at age 62 and should be interpreted accordingly.

Suggested Citation

  • Karina Undem & Taina Leinonen & Petter Kristensen & Suzanne L. Merkus & Rachel L. Hasting & Jon Michael Gran & Ingrid S. Mehlum, 2022. "Gender Differences in Associations between Biomechanical and Psychosocial Work Exposures and Age of Withdrawal from Paid Employment among Older Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-14, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:17:p:10563-:d:896661
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/17/10563/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/17/10563/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emil Sundstrup & Sannie V. Thorsen & Reiner Rugulies & Mona Larsen & Kristina Thomassen & Lars L. Andersen, 2021. "Importance of the Working Environment for Early Retirement: Prospective Cohort Study with Register Follow-Up," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-13, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:17:p:10563-:d:896661. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.