IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i15p9465-d878272.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disability and Participation in Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Fahrin Ramadan Andiwijaya

    (Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Mataram, Mataram 83125, Indonesia)

  • Calum Davey

    (International Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK)

  • Khaoula Bessame

    (West Hertfordshire NHS Trust, Watford WD18 0HB, UK)

  • Abdourahmane Ndong

    (Faculty of Health Sciences, Gaston Berger University of Saint-Louis, Saint-Louis 234, Senegal)

  • Hannah Kuper

    (International Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK)

Abstract

It is well established that access to preventative care, such as breast or cervical cancer screening, can reduce morbidity and mortality. Certain groups may be missed out of these healthcare services, such as women with disabilities, as they face many access barriers due to underlying inequalities and negative attitudes. However, the data have not been reviewed on whether women with disabilities face inequalities in the uptake of these services. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to compare the uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening in women with and without disabilities. A search was conducted in July 2021 across four databases: PubMed, MEDLINE, Global Health, and CINAHL. Quantitative studies comparing the uptake of breast or cervical cancer screening between women with and without disabilities were eligible. Twenty-nine studies were included, all from high-income settings. One third of the 29 studies (34.5%, n = 10) were deemed to have a high risk of bias, and the remainder a low risk of bias. The pooled estimates showed that women with disabilities have 0.78 (95% CI: 0.72–0.84) lower odds of attending breast cancer screening and have 0.63 (95% CI: 0.45–0.88) lower odds of attending cervical cancer screening, compared to women without disabilities. In conclusion, women with disabilities face disparities in receipt of preventative cancer care. There is consequently an urgent need to evaluate and improve the inclusivity of cancer screening programs and thereby prevent avoidable morbidity and mortality.

Suggested Citation

  • Fahrin Ramadan Andiwijaya & Calum Davey & Khaoula Bessame & Abdourahmane Ndong & Hannah Kuper, 2022. "Disability and Participation in Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-20, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9465-:d:878272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9465/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9465/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Takashi Saito & Kumiko Imahashi & Chikako Yamaki, 2024. "Use of General Health Examination and Cancer Screening among People with Disability Who Need Support from Others: Analysis of the 2016 Comprehensive Survey of Living Conditions in Japan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(2), pages 1-19, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9465-:d:878272. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.