IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i15p9400-d877186.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effects of High-Intensity Power Training versus Traditional Resistance Training on Exercise Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Yu-Hua Chang

    (Graduate Institute of Sport Coaching Science, Chinese Culture University, Taipei City 11114, Taiwan
    Department of Athletic, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu City 30013, Taiwan)

  • Yi-Chen Chou

    (Department of Athletic, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu City 30013, Taiwan)

  • Yun-Chi Chang

    (Department of Physical Education, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City 242, Taiwan)

  • Kok-Hwa Tan

    (Physical Education Office, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu City 30013, Taiwan)

  • Mei-Hsuan Wu

    (Precision Medicine Ph.D. Program, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu City 30013, Taiwan)

Abstract

Background: High-intensity interval training (HIIT) features short, repeated bursts of relatively vigorous exercise with intermittent periods of rest or low-intensity exercise. High-intensity power training (HIPT), in combination with HIIT and traditional resistance training (TRT), is characterized as multijoint high-intensity resistance exercises with low interset rest periods. HIPT requires people to finish the exercise as fast as possible, which increases acute physiological demands. The aim of the study was to investigate the differences between eight-week HIPT or TRT on exercise performance. Methods: Twenty-four college students were recruited and randomly assigned to either the HIPT or TRT group in a counterbalanced order. The power of upper and lower limbs (50% 1RM bench press and vertical jump) and anaerobic power were tested before and after the training (weeks 0 and 9). The results were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or Friedman’s test with a significance level of α = 0.05 to compare the effects of the intervention on exercise performance. Results: There were significant differences in the explosive force of the upper and lower limbs between the pretest and post-test in both the HIPT and TRT groups ( p < 0.05). However, only the HIPT group showed a significant difference in the mean power on the Wingate anaerobic test between the pretest and post-test ( p < 0.05). Conclusions: Both HIPT and TRT can improve upper and lower limb explosive force. HIPT is an efficient training protocol, which took less time and produced a better improvement in mean anaerobic power.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu-Hua Chang & Yi-Chen Chou & Yun-Chi Chang & Kok-Hwa Tan & Mei-Hsuan Wu, 2022. "The Effects of High-Intensity Power Training versus Traditional Resistance Training on Exercise Performance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-11, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9400-:d:877186
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9400/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9400/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stefania Cataldi & Vincenzo Cristian Francavilla & Valerio Bonavolontà & Ornella De Florio & Roberto Carvutto & Michele De Candia & Francesca Latino & Francesco Fischetti, 2021. "Proposal for a Fitness Program in the School Setting during the COVID 19 Pandemic: Effects of an 8-Week CrossFit Program on Psychophysical Well-Being in Healthy Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-12, March.
    2. Tatiana Moro & Giuseppe Marcolin & Antonino Bianco & Francesco Bolzetta & Linda Berton & Giuseppe Sergi & Antonio Paoli, 2020. "Effects of 6 Weeks of Traditional Resistance Training or High Intensity Interval Resistance Training on Body Composition, Aerobic Power and Strength in Healthy Young Subjects: A Randomized Parallel Tr," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-16, June.
    3. Patricia C. García-Suárez & Jorge A. Aburto-Corona & Iván Rentería & Luis M. Gómez-Miranda & José Moncada-Jiménez & Fábio Santos Lira & Barbara Moura Antunes & Alberto Jiménez-Maldonado, 2022. "Short-Term High-Intensity Circuit Training Does Not Modify Resting Heart Rate Variability in Adults during the COVID-19 Confinement," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-11, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dirk Aerenhouts & Eva D’Hondt, 2020. "Using Machines or Free Weights for Resistance Training in Novice Males? A Randomized Parallel Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-13, October.
    2. Daniel Acosta & Yui Fujii & Diana Joyce-Beaulieu & K. D. Jacobs & Anthony T. Maurelli & Eric J. Nelson & Sarah L. McKune, 2021. "Psychosocial Health of K-12 Students Engaged in Emergency Remote Education and In-Person Schooling: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Valerio Giustino & Daniele Zangla & Giuseppe Messina & Simona Pajaujiene & Kaltrina Feka & Giuseppe Battaglia & Antonino Bianco & Antonio Palma & Antonino Patti, 2022. "Kinematics of Cervical Spine during Rowing Ergometer at Different Stroke Rates in Young Rowers: A Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-8, June.
    4. Giacomo Farì & Francesco Fischetti & Alessandra Zonno & Francesco Marra & Alessia Maglie & Francesco Paolo Bianchi & Giuseppe Messina & Maurizio Ranieri & Marisa Megna, 2021. "Musculoskeletal Pain in Gymnasts: A Retrospective Analysis on a Cohort of Professional Athletes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-9, May.
    5. Jing Hu & Zhen Wang & Bingkai Lei & Junping Li & Ruiyuan Wang, 2021. "Effects of a Low-Carbohydrate High-Fat Diet Combined with High-Intensity Interval Training on Body Composition and Maximal Oxygen Uptake: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-15, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9400-:d:877186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.