IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i14p8698-d864747.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Cross-Sectional Study of the Marital Attitudes of Pregnant Women at Risk for Cystic Fibrosis and Psychological Impact of Prenatal Screening

Author

Listed:
  • Zoran Laurentiu Popa

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
    Centre for Translational Research and Systems Medicine, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania)

  • Madalin-Marius Margan

    (Department of Microscopic Morphology, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania)

  • Izabella Petre

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania)

  • Elena Bernad

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania)

  • Lavinia Stelea

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania)

  • Veronica Daniela Chiriac

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania)

  • Marius Craina

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania)

  • Ioana Mihaela Ciuca

    (Department of Pediatrics, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania)

  • Anca Mihaela Bina

    (Centre for Translational Research and Systems Medicine, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
    Department III Functional Sciences, Discipline Pathophysiology, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania)

Abstract

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is one of the most frequent genetic disorders in those with Northern European ancestry. Prenatal testing for cystic fibrosis may be used to plan and prepare for the birth of a child with the disease or to determine whether to terminate the pregnancy. The accessibility of prenatal detection for women with a high genetic risk of delivering a child with cystic fibrosis is determined by CF carriers and those affected by the disease. Moreover, prenatal testing for CF is mainly dependent on invasive diagnostic tests that can influence the mental health of the pregnant woman, and it is assumed that the birth of a CF child will have a serious influence on the couple’s subsequent family planning and marital behavior. The purpose of this research was to examine the marital attitudes of women at risk for cystic fibrosis and the psychological effect of screening for CF among pregnant women. The study followed a cross-sectional design with five questionnaires comprising Prenatal Attachment Interview (PAI), Maternal Antenatal Attachment Scale (MAAS), Pregnancy-Related Anxiety Questionnaire (PRAQ-R2), the Prenatal Psychosocial Profile (PPP), and the Marital Intimacy Questionnaire (MIQ). A total of 84 pregnant women were included in the “carriers” group for CFTR and 91 in the “non-carrier” group. CFTR-carrier mothers were likely to be more affectionate to the fetus, with better maternal–fetal quality and intensity of attachment. The same group of pregnant women was less scared of giving birth or worried about bearing a physically or mentally handicapped child compared to women who were expecting the prenatal diagnosis test for being at risk of delivering a newborn with malformations. CFTR-carrier pregnant women did not score significantly different results in the Prenatal Psychosocial Profile regarding stress levels, social support, and self-esteem. It was also found that intimacy and consensus problems inside the marriage were significantly more often experienced by CFTR carriers. Based on the current findings, it is likely that CFTR-carrier mothers have a better perception of the possible pregnancy outcomes by knowing their abnormal gene carrier status. Therefore, the psychological impact of invasive diagnostic tests is lower in this category compared with those who are unaware of the possible pregnancy outcomes. However, we promote a future analysis for pregnant women with moderate risk of giving birth to a child with single-gene mutations such as cystic fibrosis or other congenital malformations that undergo noninvasive prenatal diagnosis tests, as they become more accurate and might cause lower pre-diagnosis stress levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Zoran Laurentiu Popa & Madalin-Marius Margan & Izabella Petre & Elena Bernad & Lavinia Stelea & Veronica Daniela Chiriac & Marius Craina & Ioana Mihaela Ciuca & Anca Mihaela Bina, 2022. "A Cross-Sectional Study of the Marital Attitudes of Pregnant Women at Risk for Cystic Fibrosis and Psychological Impact of Prenatal Screening," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-14, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8698-:d:864747
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8698/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8698/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sam Schoenmakers & E. J. (Joanne) Verweij & Roseriet Beijers & Hilmar H. Bijma & Jasper V. Been & Régine P. M. Steegers-Theunissen & Marion P. G. Koopmans & Irwin K. M. Reiss & Eric A. P. Steegers, 2022. "The Impact of Maternal Prenatal Stress Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic during the First 1000 Days: A Historical Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Roxana Margan & Madalin-Marius Margan & Corneluta Fira-Mladinescu & Salomeia Putnoky & Ioana Tuta-Sas & Radu Bagiu & Zoran Laurentiu Popa & Elena Bernad & Ioana Mihaela Ciuca & Felix Bratosin & Oana C, 2022. "Impact of Stress and Financials on Romanian Infertile Women Accessing Assisted Reproductive Treatment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-10, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lobel, Marci & Preis, Heidi & Mahaffey, Brittain & Schaal, Nora K. & Yirmiya, Karen & Atzil, Shir & Reuveni, Inbal & Balestrieri, Matteo & Penengo, Chiara & Colli, Chiara & Garzitto, Marco & Driul, Lo, 2022. "Common model of stress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms in pregnant women from seven high-income Western countries at the COVID-19 pandemic onset," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    2. Sandra Simó & Juanita Cajiao-Nieto & Natalia V. Awad-Sirhan & Rafael A. Caparros-Gonzalez, 2022. "Pregnancy-Specific Stress during the First Lockdown of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Assessing Face-to-Face versus Online Recruitment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-12, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8698-:d:864747. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.