IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i12p7320-d838946.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Access to Health Information in the Polish Healthcare System—Survey Research

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Pilarska

    (Department of Medical and Pharmacy Law, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Zimmermann

    (Department of Medical and Pharmacy Law, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland)

  • Agata Zdun-Ryżewska

    (Department of Psychology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland)

Abstract

Progress in medicine, transformations in healthcare organisation systems and access to new technologies have contributed to many changes in relations and communication between patients and healthcare personnel. The time to discuss and clarify doubts has shortened, while the period of waiting for an appointment and a consultation with a specialist has often been prolonged. Due to the lack or misunderstanding of information obtained from medical professionals, many people seek health information on their own account. The purpose of this document is to analyse the access Polish patients have to health information, the sources of and reasons for seeking that information, as well as the degree to which patients are satisfied with the information they find. We will also examine cases where patients choose self-healing. This is a survey based on an original questionnaire. The survey was conducted online and offline. The results of the survey were analysed by use of descriptive statistics. The analysis has indicated that access to health information is a universal need, which is independent of gender, age or education. Health information obtained from a doctor is most desired. The second-best source of information chosen by respondents is the Internet. Family members and friends are indicated as the third information source. Polish patients greatly appreciate doctors as a source of health information; however, given the difficulties connected with gaining direct access to information from healthcare personnel, they often search non-professional sources for information. The Internet and other media may be tools supporting the establishment of a safety culture, provided that the content published therein is consulted with medical professionals.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Pilarska & Agnieszka Zimmermann & Agata Zdun-Ryżewska, 2022. "Access to Health Information in the Polish Healthcare System—Survey Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-12, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:12:p:7320-:d:838946
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7320/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7320/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mick P. Couper & Eleanor Singer & Carrie A. Levin & Floyd J. Fowler Jr. & Angela Fagerlin & Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher, 2010. "Use of the Internet and Ratings of Information Sources for Medical Decisions: Results from the DECISIONS Survey," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 30(5_suppl), pages 106-114, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hakan Aslan & Burcak Vatansever, 2018. "Efficiency of Knowledge Inflow Structures: The Mediation Effect of Task Environment Analysis," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 7(4), pages 30-43, October.
    2. Mark H. Ryan & Jonathan Yoder & Sharon K. Flores & Jason Soh & Allison A. Vanderbilt, 2016. "Using Health Information Technology to Reach Patients in Underserved Communities: A Pilot Study to Help Close the Gap With Health Disparities," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(6), pages 1-86, June.
    3. Angela Fagerlin & Karen R. Sepucha & Mick P. Couper & Carrie A. Levin & Eleanor Singer & Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher, 2010. "Patients’ Knowledge about 9 Common Health Conditions: The DECISIONS Survey," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 30(5_suppl), pages 35-52, September.
    4. Erin Mathieu, 2010. "The Internet and Medical Decision Making: Can It Replace the Role of Health Care Providers?," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 30(5_suppl), pages 14-16, September.
    5. Hershberger, Patricia E. & Gallo, Agatha M. & Kavanaugh, Karen & Olshansky, Ellen & Schwartz, Alan & Tur-Kaspa, Ilan, 2012. "The decision-making process of genetically at-risk couples considering preimplantation genetic diagnosis: Initial findings from a grounded theory study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(10), pages 1536-1543.
    6. Shen, Chan & Tina Shih, Ya-Chen, 2016. "Therapeutic substitutions in the midst of new technology diffusion: The case of treatment for localized prostate cancer," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 110-120.
    7. Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher & Mick P. Couper & Eleanor Singer & Carrie A. Levin & Floyd J. Fowler Jr. & Sonja Ziniel & Peter A. Ubel & Angela Fagerlin, 2010. "The DECISIONS Study: A Nationwide Survey of United States Adults Regarding 9 Common Medical Decisions," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 30(5_suppl), pages 20-34, September.
    8. Alistair Anderson, 2018. "Online health information and public knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours regarding antibiotics in the UK: Multiple regression analysis of Wellcome Monitor and Eurobarometer Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:12:p:7320-:d:838946. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.