IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i12p7304-d838625.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Medical Photography Usage Amongst Doctors at a Portuguese Hospital

Author

Listed:
  • Mariana Cura

    (Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal)

  • Hélio Alves

    (Unit of Anatomy, Department of Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Alameda Professor Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal)

  • José Paulo Andrade

    (Unit of Anatomy, Department of Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Alameda Professor Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
    CINTESIS@RISE, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

Technological advancements in smartphones have made it possible to create high-quality medical photographs, with the potential to revolutionise patient care. To ensure the security of the patient’s data, it is important that medical professionals receive informed consent from the patient, that physical conditions are met to take a photograph, and that these medical images are stored correctly. This study aimed to determine if medical professionals of an academic hospital make use of medical photography, and how the content is obtained, stored, transferred, and used. Methods: A 30-question questionnaire was distributed across 29 medical departments at Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João (CHUSJ), a tertiary referral and teaching hospital in Porto, Portugal, with approximately 900 medical professionals. Quantitative statistical methods were used to analyse questionnaire responses. Results: There were a total of 257 respondents. Of these, 93% used medical photography, 70% used it to document a patient’s clinical progress, 70% to ask for a second opinion, 56% for education, 65% for research and publication, and 68% to present at medical conferences. Medical photography was used by 33% weekly and 36% monthly, with 71% of respondents always asking for the patients’ consent before taking a photograph. Doctors aged 20–40 years used photography more often than doctors over 40 years of age to document the clinical progress of the patients (77% and 52%, respectively, p = 0.01) and to ask for a second opinion (78% and 52%, respectively, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our study shows that medical photography is a common practice amongst medical doctors. However, appropriate measures need to be created to obtain patients’ consent, store images, and sure the security of patients’ information.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariana Cura & Hélio Alves & José Paulo Andrade, 2022. "Medical Photography Usage Amongst Doctors at a Portuguese Hospital," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-11, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:12:p:7304-:d:838625
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7304/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7304/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher Morris & Richard E. Scott & Maurice Mars, 2021. "WhatsApp in Clinical Practice—The Challenges of Record Keeping and Storage. A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-18, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Edward Callus, 2022. "Provision of Psychological Support to a 31-Year-Old Man with SARS-CoV2-Induced Pneumonia during and after Hospitalization: A Clinical Case Report," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-7, December.
    2. Sabine Sayegh-Jodehl & Rebecca Mukowski-Kickhöfel & Diane Linke & Claudia Müller-Birn & Matthias Rose, 2022. "Use of Instant Messaging Software in a German Hospital—An Exploratory Investigation among Physicians," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-14, October.
    3. Ameet Bakhai & Leah McCauley & Liba Stones & Saria Khalil & Jay Mehta & Nicola Price & Vinodh Krishnamurthy & Lucy H. H. Parker & Derralynn Hughes, 2022. "Shining a light on an additional clinical burden: work-related digital communication survey study – COVID-19 impact on NHS staff wellbeing," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Christopher Morris & Richard E. Scott & Maurice Mars, 2022. "An Audit and Survey of Informal Use of Instant Messaging for Dermatology in District Hospitals in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-11, June.
    5. Christopher Morris & Richard E. Scott & Maurice Mars, 2022. "A Survey of Telemedicine Use by Doctors in District Hospitals in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-12, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:12:p:7304-:d:838625. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.