IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i12p7277-d838311.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and Validation of a Novel Score for Predicting Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Author

Listed:
  • Jiann-Der Lee

    (Department of Neurology, Chiayi Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 6, West Sec., Jiapu Road, Puzi City 613, Taiwan
    College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, No. 259, Wenhua 1st Rd., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan 333, Taiwan)

  • Ya-Wen Kuo

    (Department of Neurology, Chiayi Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 6, West Sec., Jiapu Road, Puzi City 613, Taiwan
    Department of Nursing, College of Nursing, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, No. 2, Sec. W., Jiapu Rd., Puzi City 613, Taiwan)

  • Chuan-Pin Lee

    (Health Information and Epidemiology Laboratory, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi 613, Taiwan)

  • Yen-Chu Huang

    (Department of Neurology, Chiayi Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 6, West Sec., Jiapu Road, Puzi City 613, Taiwan
    College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, No. 259, Wenhua 1st Rd., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan 333, Taiwan)

  • Meng Lee

    (Department of Neurology, Chiayi Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 6, West Sec., Jiapu Road, Puzi City 613, Taiwan
    College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, No. 259, Wenhua 1st Rd., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan 333, Taiwan)

  • Tsong-Hai Lee

    (College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, No. 259, Wenhua 1st Rd., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
    Department of Neurology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan)

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF)—whether paroxysmal or sustained—increases the risk of stroke. We developed and validated a risk score for identifying patients at risk of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (pAF) after acute ischemic stroke (AIS). A total of 6033 patients with AIS who received 24 h Holter monitoring were identified in the Chang Gung Research Database. Among the identified patients, 5290 with pAF and without AF were included in the multivariable logistic regression analysis to develop the pAF prediction model. The ABCD-SD score ( A ge, Systolic B lood pressure, C oronary artery disease, D yslipidemia, and S tandard D eviation of heart rate) comprises age (+2 points for every 10 years), systolic blood pressure (−1 point for every 20 mmHg), coronary artery disease (+2 points), dyslipidemia (−2 points), and standard deviation of heart rate (+2 points for every 3 beats per minute). Overall, 5.2% (274/5290) of patients had pAF. The pAF risk ranged from 0.8% (ABCD-SD score ≤ 7) to 18.3% (ABCD-SD score ≥ 15). The model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCC) of 0.767 in the model development group. The ABCD-SD score could aid clinicians in identifying patients with AIS at risk of pAF for advanced cardiac monitoring.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiann-Der Lee & Ya-Wen Kuo & Chuan-Pin Lee & Yen-Chu Huang & Meng Lee & Tsong-Hai Lee, 2022. "Development and Validation of a Novel Score for Predicting Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation in Acute Ischemic Stroke," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-11, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:12:p:7277-:d:838311
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7277/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7277/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew J. Vickers & Elena B. Elkin, 2006. "Decision Curve Analysis: A Novel Method for Evaluating Prediction Models," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 26(6), pages 565-574, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ja Hyeon Ku & Myong Kim & Seok-Soo Byun & Hyeon Jeong & Cheol Kwak & Hyeon Hoe Kim & Sang Eun Lee, 2015. "External Validation of Models for Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis in Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-10, October.
    2. Lin Lu & Laurent Dercle & Binsheng Zhao & Lawrence H. Schwartz, 2021. "Deep learning for the prediction of early on-treatment response in metastatic colorectal cancer from serial medical imaging," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Yiwang Zhou & Peter X.K. Song & Haoda Fu, 2021. "Net benefit index: Assessing the influence of a biomarker for individualized treatment rules," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(4), pages 1254-1264, December.
    4. Shamil D. Cooray & Lihini A. Wijeyaratne & Georgia Soldatos & John Allotey & Jacqueline A. Boyle & Helena J. Teede, 2020. "The Unrealised Potential for Predicting Pregnancy Complications in Women with Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-20, April.
    5. Khushal Arjan & Lui G Forni & Richard M Venn & David Hunt & Luke Eliot Hodgson, 2021. "Clinical decision-making in older adults following emergency admission to hospital. Derivation and validation of a risk stratification score: OPERA," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-12, March.
    6. Tracey L. Marsh & Holly Janes & Margaret S. Pepe, 2020. "Statistical inference for net benefit measures in biomarker validation studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(3), pages 843-852, September.
    7. Chang Wook Jeong & Sangchul Lee & Jin-Woo Jung & Byung Ki Lee & Seong Jin Jeong & Sung Kyu Hong & Seok-Soo Byun & Sang Eun Lee, 2014. "Mobile Application-Based Seoul National University Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator: Development, Validation, and Comparative Analysis with Two Western Risk Calculators in Korean Men," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-7, April.
    8. Yanqing Wang & Yingqi Zhao & Yingye Zheng, 2022. "Targeted Search for Individualized Clinical Decision Rules to Optimize Clinical Outcomes," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 14(3), pages 564-581, December.
    9. Tae Yoon Lee & Paul Gustafson & Mohsen Sadatsafavi, 2023. "Closed-Form Solution of the Unit Normal Loss Integral in 2 Dimensions, with Application in Value-of-Information Analysis," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 43(5), pages 621-626, July.
    10. Baker Stuart G. & Van Calster Ben & Steyerberg Ewout W., 2012. "Evaluating a New Marker for Risk Prediction Using the Test Tradeoff: An Update," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-37, March.
    11. Kevin Sandeman & Juho T Eineluoto & Joona Pohjonen & Andrew Erickson & Tuomas P Kilpeläinen & Petrus Järvinen & Henrikki Santti & Anssi Petas & Mika Matikainen & Suvi Marjasuo & Anu Kenttämies & Tuoma, 2020. "Prostate MRI added to CAPRA, MSKCC and Partin cancer nomograms significantly enhances the prediction of adverse findings and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-14, July.
    12. Danny J N Wong & Steve Harris & Arun Sahni & James R Bedford & Laura Cortes & Richard Shawyer & Andrew M Wilson & Helen A Lindsay & Doug Campbell & Scott Popham & Lisa M Barneto & Paul S Myles & SNAP-, 2020. "Developing and validating subjective and objective risk-assessment measures for predicting mortality after major surgery: An international prospective cohort study," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(10), pages 1-22, October.
    13. François Luthi & Olivier Deriaz & Philippe Vuistiner & Cyrille Burrus & Roger Hilfiker, 2014. "Predicting Non Return to Work after Orthopaedic Trauma: The Wallis Occupational Rehabilitation RisK (WORRK) Model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-11, April.
    14. Capponi, Giovanna & Martinelli, Arianna & Nuvolari, Alessandro, 2022. "Breakthrough innovations and where to find them," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(1).
    15. Ying Huang & Eric Laber, 2016. "Personalized Evaluation of Biomarker Value: A Cost-Benefit Perspective," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 8(1), pages 43-65, June.
    16. Thanutorn Wongthida & Lalita Lumkul & Jayanton Patumanond & Wattana Wongtheptian & Dilok Piyayotai & Phichayut Phinyo, 2022. "Development of a Clinical Risk Score for Prediction of Life-Threatening Arrhythmia Events in Patients with ST Elevated Acute Coronary Syndrome after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-18, February.
    17. Konstantina Chalkou & Andrew J. Vickers & Fabio Pellegrini & Andrea Manca & Georgia Salanti, 2023. "Decision Curve Analysis for Personalized Treatment Choice between Multiple Options," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 43(3), pages 337-349, April.
    18. Dexin Chen & Meiting Fu & Liangjie Chi & Liyan Lin & Jiaxin Cheng & Weisong Xue & Chenyan Long & Wei Jiang & Xiaoyu Dong & Jian Sui & Dajia Lin & Jianping Lu & Shuangmu Zhuo & Side Liu & Guoxin Li & G, 2022. "Prognostic and predictive value of a pathomics signature in gastric cancer," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    19. Anirudh Tomer & Daan Nieboer & Monique J. Roobol & Ewout W. Steyerberg & Dimitris Rizopoulos, 2019. "Personalized schedules for surveillance of low‐risk prostate cancer patients," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 75(1), pages 153-162, March.
    20. Bernd Lütkenhöner & Türker Basel, 2013. "Predictive Modeling for Diagnostic Tests with High Specificity, but Low Sensitivity: A Study of the Glycerol Test in Patients with Suspected Menière’s Disease," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-12, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:12:p:7277-:d:838311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.