IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i4p1691-d496962.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An On-Line Cross-Sectional Questionnaire to Assess Knowledge of COVID-19 Pandemic among Citizens Tested for the SARS-CoV-2 Virus in Quito and Ibarra, Ecuador

Author

Listed:
  • David Ortega-Paredes

    (Unidad de Investigación en Enfermedades Transmitidas por Alimentos y Resistencia a los Antimicrobianos (UNIETAR), Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Central del Ecuador, Quito 170129, Ecuador
    Education Unit, Life Science Initiative, Quito 170607, Ecuador)

  • Jeannete Zurita

    (Zurita & Zurita Laboratorios, Biomedical Research Unit, Quito 170104, Ecuador)

  • Camilo Zurita

    (Zurita & Zurita Laboratorios, Biomedical Research Unit, Quito 170104, Ecuador)

  • Paula Leoro-Garzón

    (Departamento de Biología Molecular, Laboratorio Clínico e Inmunológico Inmunolab, Quito 170403, Ecuador)

  • Galo Leoro-Monroy

    (Departamento de Biología Molecular, Laboratorio Clínico e Inmunológico Inmunolab, Quito 170403, Ecuador)

  • César Marcelo Larrea-Álvarez

    (Education Unit, Life Science Initiative, Quito 170607, Ecuador)

  • Karen Loaiza

    (Education Unit, Life Science Initiative, Quito 170607, Ecuador)

  • Esteban Fernandez-Moreira

    (Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Escuela de Medicina, Universidad de las Américas, Quito 170517, Ecuador)

  • Gabriel Molina-Cuasapaz

    (Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Recursos Naturales, Carrera de Medicina Veterinaria, Universidad Técnica de Cotopaxi, Latacunga-Cotopaxi 050101, Ecuador)

  • Marco Larrea-Álvarez

    (School of Biological Science and Engineering, Yachay-Tech University, Hacienda San José, Urcuquí-Imbabura 100650, Ecuador)

Abstract

Several public health measures have been implemented to contain the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. The adherence to control measures is known to be influenced by people’s knowledge, attitudes and practices with regard to the disease. This study aimed at assessing COVID-19 knowledge in individuals who were tested for the virus. An online cross-sectional survey of 32 items, adapted to the national context, was conducted among 1656 Ecuadorians. The mean knowledge score was 22.5 ± 3 out of 28, with significant differences being observed with regard to educational attainment. People with postgraduate training scored higher than those with college, secondary and elementary instruction. Indeed, multiple linear regression revealed that lower scores were associated significantly with the latter three levels of education. Interviewees were knowledgeable about the symptoms, detection, transmission and prevention of the disease. However, they were less assertive regarding the characteristics of the virus as well as the usefulness of traditional and unproven treatments. These outcomes indicated a lack of knowledge in fundamental aspects of virus biology, which may limit the effectiveness of further prevention campaigns. Conclusively, educational and communicational programs must place emphasis on explaining the basic molecular characteristics of SARS-CoV-2; such information will certainly contribute to improve the public’s adherence to control measures.

Suggested Citation

  • David Ortega-Paredes & Jeannete Zurita & Camilo Zurita & Paula Leoro-Garzón & Galo Leoro-Monroy & César Marcelo Larrea-Álvarez & Karen Loaiza & Esteban Fernandez-Moreira & Gabriel Molina-Cuasapaz & Ma, 2021. "An On-Line Cross-Sectional Questionnaire to Assess Knowledge of COVID-19 Pandemic among Citizens Tested for the SARS-CoV-2 Virus in Quito and Ibarra, Ecuador," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-15, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:4:p:1691-:d:496962
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/4/1691/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/4/1691/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Takele T. Desta & Tewodros Mulugeta, 2020. "Living with COVID-19-triggered pseudoscience and conspiracies," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 65(6), pages 713-714, July.
    2. Conner, Mark & McEachan, Rosemary & Lawton, Rebecca & Gardner, Peter, 2017. "Applying the reasoned action approach to understanding health protection and health risk behaviors," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 140-148.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Ortega-Paredes & César Marcelo Larrea-Álvarez & Santiago Isaac Jijón & Karen Loaiza & Miroslava Anna Šefcová & Gabriel Molina-Cuasapaz & Pedro Barba & Christian Vinueza-Burgos & Esteban Fernande, 2021. "A Cross-Sectional Study to Assess Knowledge of COVID-19 among Undergraduate Students in North-Central Ecuador," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-15, August.
    2. Ying-Hsuan Chen & Shun-Lung Chao & Yen-Wei Chu, 2022. "Effects of Perceived Benefit on Vitamin D Supplementation Intention: A Theory of Planned Behaviour Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Damian J. Rivers & Giancarla Unser-Schutz & Nathanael Rudolph, 2023. "Vaccine Hesitancy and Susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 Misinformation in Japanese Youth: The Contribution of Personality Traits and National Identity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(1), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Jack P Hughes & Alexandros Efstratiou & Sara R Komer & Lilli A Baxter & Milica Vasiljevic & Ana C Leite, 2022. "The impact of risk perceptions and belief in conspiracy theories on COVID-19 pandemic-related behaviours," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Huang, Qian & Gilkey, Melissa B. & Thompson, Peyton & Grabert, Brigid K. & Dailey, Susan Alton & Brewer, Noel T., 2022. "Explaining higher Covid-19 vaccination among some US primary care professionals," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    6. Muhammad Zeeshan Zafar & Adnan Maqbool & Lucian-Ionel Cioca & Syed Ghulam Meran Shah & Shahjahan Masud, 2021. "Accentuating the Interrelation between Consumer Intention and Healthy Packaged Food Selection during COVID-19: A Case Study of Pakistan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-14, March.
    7. Hagger, Martin S. & Polet, Juho & Lintunen, Taru, 2018. "The reasoned action approach applied to health behavior: Role of past behavior and tests of some key moderators using meta-analytic structural equation modeling," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 85-94.
    8. Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez & Eduardo Navarro-Jiménez & Juan Antonio Simón-Sanjurjo & Ana Isabel Beltran-Velasco & Carmen Cecilia Laborde-Cárdenas & Juan Camilo Benitez-Agudelo & Álvaro Bustamante-, 2022. "Mis–Dis Information in COVID-19 Health Crisis: A Narrative Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-24, April.
    9. repec:thr:techub:10010:y:2020:i:1:p:189-200 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Maltez Mabuie, 2020. "Role of peer educators in behaviour change communication interventions for HIV prevention among people who inject drugs: Systematic review article," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 10(1), pages 189-200, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:4:p:1691-:d:496962. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.