IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i22p12112-d682028.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Subjective Experience of Dyspareunia in Women with Endometriosis: A Systematic Review with Narrative Synthesis of Qualitative Research

Author

Listed:
  • Federica Facchin

    (Department of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Largo Gemelli 1, 20123 Milan, Italy)

  • Laura Buggio

    (Gynaecology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via della Commenda 12, 20122 Milan, Italy)

  • Dhouha Dridi

    (Gynaecology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via della Commenda 12, 20122 Milan, Italy)

  • Giussy Barbara

    (Gynaecology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via della Commenda 12, 20122 Milan, Italy
    SVSeD—Service for Sexual and Domestic Violence and Obstetrics and Gynaecology Emergency Department, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via della Commenda 12, 20122 Milan, Italy)

  • Paolo Vercellini

    (Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milan, Italy)

Abstract

Although dyspareunia (pain during intercourse) is common in women with endometriosis, there is poor qualitative evidence describing women’s subjective experience of this symptom. This systematic review of qualitative research aimed to provide an in-depth exploration of women’s lived experience of dyspareunia (i.e., how they perceive and describe their pain, how they deal with it, how it affects their psychological health and intimate relationships). A total of 17 published articles were included. Our findings, derived from thematic analysis, highlighted that endometriosis-related dyspareunia manifests itself in multiple forms (deep, introital, and/or positional dyspareunia, at orgasm, during and/or after intercourse). Women use a variety of coping strategies to deal with sexual pain, such as interrupting or avoiding intercourse, enduring pain to seek pregnancy, and/or finding alternative ways to enjoy sexuality. Dyspareunia impairs women’s psychological health, especially in terms of poor self-esteem and sense of femininity and has negative consequences on intimate relationships. Unfortunately, both women and physicians are often reluctant to discuss sexual issues. Sexual health should be routinely assessed during counselling with endometriosis patients. Helping women find targeted strategies to enjoy sexuality despite endometriosis may significantly improve their psychological health and quality of life.

Suggested Citation

  • Federica Facchin & Laura Buggio & Dhouha Dridi & Giussy Barbara & Paolo Vercellini, 2021. "The Subjective Experience of Dyspareunia in Women with Endometriosis: A Systematic Review with Narrative Synthesis of Qualitative Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-14, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:22:p:12112-:d:682028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/22/12112/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/22/12112/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Seear, Kate, 2009. "The etiquette of endometriosis: Stigmatisation, menstrual concealment and the diagnostic delay," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 1220-1227, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Supriya Garikipati & Penelope A. Phillips-Howard, 2022. "Information, Choice and Menstrual Outcomes: Evidence from a CommunityBased Intervention in Indi," Working Papers 202211, University of Liverpool, Department of Economics.
    2. Hanna Grundström & Siw Alehagen & Preben Kjølhede & Carina Berterö, 2018. "The double‐edged experience of healthcare encounters among women with endometriosis: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 205-211, January.
    3. Elia Fernández-Martínez & Ana Abreu-Sánchez & Juan Francisco Velarde-García & María Teresa Iglesias-López & Jorge Pérez-Corrales & Domingo Palacios-Ceña, 2020. "Living with Restrictions. The Perspective of Nursing Students with Primary Dysmenorrhea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-12, November.
    4. Ana Abreu-Sánchez & María Laura Parra-Fernández & María Dolores Onieva-Zafra & Elia Fernández-Martínez, 2020. "Perception of Menstrual Normality and Abnormality in Spanish Female Nursing Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-12, September.
    5. Luigi Della Corte & Claudia Di Filippo & Olimpia Gabrielli & Sabrina Reppuccia & Valentina Lucia La Rosa & Rosalia Ragusa & Michele Fichera & Elena Commodari & Giuseppe Bifulco & Pierluigi Giampaolino, 2020. "The Burden of Endometriosis on Women’s Lifespan: A Narrative Overview on Quality of Life and Psychosocial Wellbeing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-17, June.
    6. Juan Diego Ramos-Pichardo & Ángela María Ortega-Galán & María Teresa Iglesias-López & Ana Abreu-Sánchez & Elia Fernández-Martínez, 2020. "Why Do Some Spanish Nursing Students with Menstrual Pain Fail to Consult Healthcare Professionals?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-14, November.
    7. Elia Fernández-Martínez & Ana Abreu-Sánchez & Jorge Pérez-Corrales & Javier Ruiz-Castillo & Juan Francisco Velarde-García & Domingo Palacios-Ceña, 2020. "Living with Pain and Looking for a Safe Environment: A Qualitative Study among Nursing Students with Dysmenorrhea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-15, September.
    8. Punita Bhatt & Supriya Garikipati, 2021. "Culture, Collectivism and Empowerment: The Role of Feminist Ideologies in Women’s Work and Organization," Working Papers 202108, University of Liverpool, Department of Economics.
    9. Supriya Garikipati & Penelope A. Phillips-Howard, 2021. "What’s the Bleeding Problem? Period Poverty, Information Failure and Consumer Preferences in the Global South," Working Papers 202107, University of Liverpool, Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:22:p:12112-:d:682028. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.