IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i22p11920-d678343.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spiritual Well-Being for Croatian Cancer Patients: Validation and Applicability of the Croatian Version of the EORTC QLQ-SWB32

Author

Listed:
  • Ivana Dabo

    (Department of Epidemiology, Teaching Institute of Public Health of the Primorje—Gorski Kotar County, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia)

  • Iva Skočilić

    (Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia)

  • Bella Vivat

    (Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London W1T 7NF, UK)

  • Ingrid Belac-Lovasić

    (Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia
    Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University of Rijeka School of Medicine, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia)

  • Iva Sorta-Bilajac Turina

    (Department of Social Medicine, Teaching Institute of Public Health of the Primorje—Gorski Kotar County, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia
    Department of Environmental Medicine, University of Rijeka School of Medicine, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia)

Abstract

Spiritual well-being is a recognized predictor of health-related quality of life in palliative patients. No research in Croatia has yet addressed this field. This study, the first of its kind in Croatia, validated a Croatian translation of the EORTC QLQ-SWB32 measure of spiritual well-being with curative Croatian oncology patients and assessed its use and value. The study was conducted between July 2019 and January 2020 at the Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital Rijeka, with 143 cancer patients, using the linguistically validated Croatian version of the measure. All patients found the measure acceptable. Confirmatory factor analysis aligned with the structure found in previous studies. Cronbach’s alpha confirmed internal consistency. Female participants scored higher on the RSG (Relationship with Someone or Something Greater), RG (Relationship with God), and EX (Existential) scales, and on Global-SWB. Patients with breast and gynecological tumors scored higher on RG. Older patients scored lower on RSG, RG and EX. Retirees and those with below-average incomes scored lower on EX. Participants who identified as having no religion scored lower on RSG. Stage I cancer patients scored higher on RG. The Croatian version of the EORTC QLQ-SWB32 is an acceptable, valid, and reliable measure of SWB for Croatian cancer patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Ivana Dabo & Iva Skočilić & Bella Vivat & Ingrid Belac-Lovasić & Iva Sorta-Bilajac Turina, 2021. "Spiritual Well-Being for Croatian Cancer Patients: Validation and Applicability of the Croatian Version of the EORTC QLQ-SWB32," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-15, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:22:p:11920-:d:678343
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/22/11920/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/22/11920/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. de Haes, Johanna C. J. M. & van Knippenberg, Ferdinand C. E., 1985. "The quality of life of cancer patients: A review of the literature," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 20(8), pages 809-817, January.
    2. McCorkle, Ruth & Quint-Benoliel, Jeanne, 1983. "Symptom distress, current concerns and mood disturbance after diagnosis of life-threatening disease," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 17(7), pages 431-438, January.
    3. Song xian Zhao & Wan min Qiang & Xiao na Zheng & Zhi qin Luo, 2018. "Development of death education training content for adult cancer patients: A mixed methods study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(23-24), pages 4400-4410, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ping‐ping He & Qian‐qian Shen & Ye‐shi Chen & Juping Yu & Zhao‐xia Li & Xin‐ping Ouyang, 2020. "Development and validation of a Chinese‐language instrument measuring empowerment needs of patients after a percutaneous coronary intervention," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(2), pages 364-373, June.
    2. Ami Rokach, 2007. "Coping with loneliness among the terminally ill," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 82(3), pages 487-503, July.
    3. Massimo Aria & Michelangelo Misuraca & Maria Spano, 2020. "Mapping the Evolution of Social Research and Data Science on 30 Years of Social Indicators Research," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 803-831, June.
    4. Erik Angner & Jennifer Ghandhi & Kristen Williams Purvis & Daniel Amante & Jeroan Allison, 2013. "Daily Functioning, Health Status, and Happiness in Older Adults," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 14(5), pages 1563-1574, October.
    5. Wun-Yu You & Tzu-Pei Yeh & Kwo-Chen Lee & Wei-Fen Ma, 2020. "A Preliminary Study of the Comfort in Patients with Leukemia Staying in a Positive Pressure Isolation Room," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-10, May.
    6. Kwua‐Yun Wang & Nai‐Wen Chang & Tzu‐Hsin Wu & Chu‐Chun Hsu & Ya‐Hsin Lee & Shih‐Chun Lee, 2010. "Post‐discharge health care needs of patients after lung cancer resection," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(17‐18), pages 2471-2480, September.
    7. Marie-Christine Taillefer & Gilles Dupuis & Marie-Anne Roberge & Sylvie LeMay, 2003. "Health-Related Quality of Life Models: Systematic Review of the Literature," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 293-323, November.
    8. Anne Gadermann & Anita Hubley & Lara Russell & Anita Palepu, 2014. "Subjective Health-Related Quality of Life in Homeless and Vulnerably Housed Individuals and Its Relationship with Self-Reported Physical and Mental Health Status," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 116(2), pages 341-352, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:22:p:11920-:d:678343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.