IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i18p9683-d635381.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of the Benefits, Satisfaction, and Limitations of Intergenerational Face-to-Face Activities: A General Population Survey in Spain

Author

Listed:
  • Alejandro Canedo-García

    (Department of Psychology, Sociology and Philosophy, Universidad de León, 24071 León, Spain)

  • Jesús-Nicasio García-Sánchez

    (Department of Psychology, Sociology and Philosophy, Universidad de León, 24071 León, Spain)

  • Cristina Díaz-Prieto

    (Department of Psychology, Sociology and Philosophy, Universidad de León, 24071 León, Spain)

  • Deilis-Ivonne Pacheco-Sanz

    (Department of Psychology, Universidad de Valladolid, 47011 Valladolid, Spain)

Abstract

Over the last decades, social isolation and loneliness among older adults have given rise to an increased interest in the study of intergenerational relationships. Intergenerational programs provide a great opportunity for older adults to connect with people of other generations. Many studies have reported the beneficial effects of these programs, improving the mental and physical health of the elderly and contributing to better academic formation and social skills in children. The aim of this study was to examine the benefits, satisfaction, and limitations of the intergenerational interactions derived from the performance of face-to-face activities, such as daily and healthcare activities, educational, cultural and leisure activities, and physical or sport activities. Participants were subjects living in Spain of any age (grouped into three age groups: <22, 22–40, and >40 years old) and from different social groups who completed an electronic 88-item questionnaire. The analysis of sociodemographic variables of the survey respondents revealed that people aged 40 or more, with personal autonomy, single or married, and living with a partner and/or other relative, and not retired, performed face-to-face activities with people of other generations with a significantly higher frequency than the rest of the groups for each variable. Most participants who participated in intergenerational face-to-face activities reported benefits to their physical and mental health, mood, relationships, self-determination, social participation, and academic education. Most participants were quite or very satisfied with the person with whom they performed this type of activities, especially if this person was a friend or a close relative. Except for grandparents, people who participated in intergenerational face-to-face activities and who had no limitations or disabilities were more frequently reported by the participants. In conclusion, intergenerational interactions derived from the performance of face-to-face activities can contribute to improve both the physical and mental health, social skills, and relationships of all people involved.

Suggested Citation

  • Alejandro Canedo-García & Jesús-Nicasio García-Sánchez & Cristina Díaz-Prieto & Deilis-Ivonne Pacheco-Sanz, 2021. "Evaluation of the Benefits, Satisfaction, and Limitations of Intergenerational Face-to-Face Activities: A General Population Survey in Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-17, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:18:p:9683-:d:635381
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/18/9683/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/18/9683/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tara L. Gruenewald & Elizabeth K. Tanner & Linda P. Fried & Michelle C. Carlson & Qian-Li Xue & Jeanine M. Parisi & George W. Rebok & Lisa M. Yarnell & Teresa E. Seeman, 2016. "The Baltimore Experience Corps Trial: Enhancing Generativity via Intergenerational Activity Engagement in Later Life," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 71(4), pages 661-670.
    2. Erwin J. Tan & George W. Rebok & Qilu Yu & Constantine E. Frangakis & Michelle C. Carlson & Tao Wang & Michelle Ricks & Elizabeth K. Tanner & Sylvia McGill & Linda P. Fried, 2009. "The Long-Term Relationship Between High-Intensity Volunteering and Physical Activity in Older African American Women," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 64(2), pages 304-311.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alejandro Canedo-García & Jesús-Nicasio García-Sánchez, 2022. "Exploring the Instrumental and Emotional Supports for Sustainability and Social Participation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-16, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhong, Sinan & Lee, Chanam & Foster, Margaret J. & Bian, Jiahe, 2020. "Intergenerational communities: A systematic literature review of intergenerational interactions and older adults’ health-related outcomes," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    2. Nicole Ruggiano & Janice O’Driscoll & Andreja Lukic & Linda Schotthoefer, 2017. "“Work Is Like a Therapy That Prevents Agingâ€," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(1), pages 21582440166, February.
    3. Alma Au & Simon Lai & Wen Wu & Jan Hofer & Holger Busch & Iva Poláčková Šolcová & Peter Tavel & Sheung-Tak Cheng, 2020. "Generativity and Positive Emotion in Older Adults: Mediation of Achievement and Altruism Goal Attainment Across Three Cultures," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 677-692, February.
    4. Molli R. Grossman & Diana Wang & Tara L. Gruenewald, 2019. "Variations in Daily Cognitive Affective States as a Function of Variations in Daily Generative Activity," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 19-34, January.
    5. Hong, S.I. & Morrow-Howell, Nancy, 2010. "Health outcomes of Experience Corps®: A high-commitment volunteer program," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(2), pages 414-420, July.
    6. Chao Yang & Yanli Wang & Yuhui Wang & Xuemeng Zhang & Yong Liu & Hong Chen, 2020. "The Effect of Sense of Community Responsibility on Residents’ Altruistic Behavior: Evidence from the Dictator Game," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-10, January.
    7. Fothergill, Kate E. & Ensminger, Margaret E. & Robertson, Judy & Green, Kerry M. & Thorpe, Roland J. & Juon, Hee-Soon, 2011. "Effects of social integration on health: A prospective study of community engagement among African American women," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 291-298, January.
    8. Rebecca Whear & Fiona Campbell & Morwenna Rogers & Anthea Sutton & Ellie Robinson‐Carter & Richard Sharpe & Stuart Cohen & Ronald Fergy & Ruth Garside & Dylan Kneale & G. J. Melendez‐Torres & Joanna T, 2023. "What is the effect of intergenerational activities on the wellbeing and mental health of older people?: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), December.
    9. Yu-Chih Chen & Natalee Hung & Bobo H. P. Lau & Rebecca M. P. Choy Yung & Ellmon S. M. Fung & Cecilia L. W. Chan, 2022. "Generativity and Gendered Pathways to Health: The Role of Human, Social, and Financial Capital Past Mid-Life," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-14, April.
    10. Cornwell, Benjamin & Laumann, Edward O., 2015. "The health benefits of network growth: New evidence from a national survey of older adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 94-106.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:18:p:9683-:d:635381. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.