IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i15p8223-d607593.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Musculoskeletal Disorders’ Classification Proposal for Application in Occupational Medicine

Author

Listed:
  • Pablo Monteiro Pereira

    (Associated Laboratory for Energy, Transports and Aeronautics, (LAETA/ROA), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal)

  • João Amaro

    (Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal)

  • Bruno Tillmann Ribeiro

    (Occupational Safe and Health Department, IMTEP/PETROBRAS, Macaé 27913-350, Brazil)

  • Ana Gomes

    (Occupational Safe and Health Department, Ria Blades/Siemens Gamesa, 3840-346 Vagos, Portugal)

  • Paulo De Oliveira

    (Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal)

  • Joana Duarte

    (Associated Laboratory for Energy, Transports and Aeronautics, (LAETA/PROA), Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • João Ferraz

    (Associated Laboratory for Energy, Transports and Aeronautics, (LAETA/PROA), Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • João Santos Baptista

    (Associated Laboratory for Energy, Transports and Aeronautics, (LAETA/PROA), Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • José Torres Costa

    (Associated Laboratory for Energy, Transports and Aeronautics, (LAETA/ROA), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

Occupational-specific classifications of musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) are scarce and do not answer specific clinical questions. Thus, a specific classification was developed and proposed, covering criteria applicable to daily clinical activity. It was considered that the disorder development process is the same across all work-related MSDs (WRMSDs). Concepts of clinical pathology were applied to the characteristics of WRMSDs pathophysiology, cellular and tissue alterations. Then, the correlation of the inflammatory mechanisms with the injury onset mode was graded into four levels (MSDs 0–3). Criteria of legal, occupational and internal medicine, semiology, physiology and orthopaedics, image medicine and diagnostics were applied. Next, the classification was analysed by experts, two occupational physicians, two physiatrists and occupational physicians and one orthopaedist. This approach will allow WRMSD prevention and improve therapeutic management, preventing injuries from becoming chronic and facilitating communication between occupational health physicians and the other specialities. The four levels tool relate aetiopathogenic, clinical, occupational and radiological concepts into a single classification. This allows for improving the ability to determine a WRMSD and understanding what preventive and therapeutic measures should be taken, avoiding chronicity. The developed tool is straightforward, easy to understand and suitable for WRMSDs, facilitating communication between occupational physicians and physicians from other specialities.

Suggested Citation

  • Pablo Monteiro Pereira & João Amaro & Bruno Tillmann Ribeiro & Ana Gomes & Paulo De Oliveira & Joana Duarte & João Ferraz & João Santos Baptista & José Torres Costa, 2021. "Musculoskeletal Disorders’ Classification Proposal for Application in Occupational Medicine," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-11, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:15:p:8223-:d:607593
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/15/8223/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/15/8223/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pablo Monteiro Pereira & João Santos Baptista & Filipe Conceição & Joana Duarte & João Ferraz & José Torres Costa, 2022. "Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome Risk Associated with Squats: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-29, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:15:p:8223-:d:607593. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.