IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i14p7224-d589356.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Association of Microbiome with Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review of the Metagenomic Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Lee Su Mun

    (School of Dentistry, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur 57000, Malaysia)

  • See Wye Lum

    (School of Dentistry, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur 57000, Malaysia)

  • Genevieve Kong Yuiin Sze

    (School of Dentistry, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur 57000, Malaysia)

  • Cheong Hock Yoong

    (School of Dentistry, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur 57000, Malaysia)

  • Kwek Ching Yung

    (School of Dentistry, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur 57000, Malaysia)

  • Liong Kah Lok

    (School of Dentistry, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur 57000, Malaysia)

  • Divya Gopinath

    (Oral Diagnosis and Surgical Sciences Division, School of Dentistry, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur 57000, Malaysia)

Abstract

The past decade has witnessed a surge in epidemiological studies that have explored the relationship between the oral microbiome and oral cancer. Owing to the diversity of the published data, a comprehensive systematic overview of the currently available evidence is critical. This review summarises the current evidence on the metagenomic studies on the oral microbiome in oral cancer. A systematic search was conducted in Medline and Embase databases to identify original studies examining the differences in the oral microbiome of oral cancer cases and controls. A total of twenty-six studies were identified that reported differences in microbial abundance between oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and controls. Although almost all the studies identified microbial dysbiosis to be associated with oral cancer, the detailed qualitative analysis did not reveal the presence/abundance of any individual bacteria or a consortium to be consistently enriched in OSCC samples across the studies. Interestingly, few studies reported a surge of periodontopathogenic taxa, especially Fusobacteria , whereas others demonstrated a depletion of commensal taxa Streptococci . Considerable heterogeneity could be identified in the parameters used for designing the studies as well as reporting the microbial data. If microbiome data needs to be translated in the future, to complement the clinical parameters for diagnosis and prognosis of oral cancer, further studies with the integration of clinical variables, adequate statistical power, reproducible methods, and models are required.

Suggested Citation

  • Lee Su Mun & See Wye Lum & Genevieve Kong Yuiin Sze & Cheong Hock Yoong & Kwek Ching Yung & Liong Kah Lok & Divya Gopinath, 2021. "Association of Microbiome with Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review of the Metagenomic Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-21, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:14:p:7224-:d:589356
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/14/7224/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/14/7224/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Claire Duvallet & Sean M. Gibbons & Thomas Gurry & Rafael A. Irizarry & Eric J. Alm, 2017. "Meta-analysis of gut microbiome studies identifies disease-specific and shared responses," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-10, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Braden T Tierney & Yingxuan Tan & Zhen Yang & Bing Shui & Michaela J Walker & Benjamin M Kent & Aleksandar D Kostic & Chirag J Patel, 2022. "Systematically assessing microbiome–disease associations identifies drivers of inconsistency in metagenomic research," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(3), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Antonino Malacrinò & Victoria A Sadowski & Tvisha K Martin & Nathalia Cavichiolli de Oliveira & Ian J Brackett & James D Feller & Kristian J Harris & Orlando Combita Heredia & Rosa Vescio & Alison E B, 2020. "Biological invasions alter environmental microbiomes: A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-12, October.
    3. Sean M Gibbons & Claire Duvallet & Eric J Alm, 2018. "Correcting for batch effects in case-control microbiome studies," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Alan Le Goallec & Braden T Tierney & Jacob M Luber & Evan M Cofer & Aleksandar D Kostic & Chirag J Patel, 2020. "A systematic machine learning and data type comparison yields metagenomic predictors of infant age, sex, breastfeeding, antibiotic usage, country of origin, and delivery type," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-21, May.
    5. Qi Su & Qin Liu & Raphaela Iris Lau & Jingwan Zhang & Zhilu Xu & Yun Kit Yeoh & Thomas W. H. Leung & Whitney Tang & Lin Zhang & Jessie Q. Y. Liang & Yuk Kam Yau & Jiaying Zheng & Chengyu Liu & Mengjin, 2022. "Faecal microbiome-based machine learning for multi-class disease diagnosis," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-8, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:14:p:7224-:d:589356. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.