IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i11p5779-d563820.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Safety Assessment of Toxic Metals in Commonly Used Herbs, Spices, Tea, and Coffee in Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Grażyna Kowalska

    (Department of Tourism and Recreation, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 15 Akademicka Street, 20-950 Lublin, Poland)

Abstract

The presented study was aimed at the determination of the level of contamination with heavy metals (Cd, Pb, As, and Hg) in 240 samples of plant materials, i.e., herbal raw materials, spices, tea, and coffee. Moreover, a probabilistic risk assessment (noncarcinogenic and carcinogenic risks) was estimated by models including target hazard quotient (THQ) and cancer risk (CR). The samples were subjected to microwave mineralisation with the use of HNO 3 (65%), while the determination of the content of the elements was performed with the use of inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP–MS) and a mercury analyser. The element which was characterised by the highest level of accumulation in the analysed samples was lead (from 0.010 to 5.680 mg/kg). Among the heavy metals under analysis, the lowest concentration was noted in the case of mercury (from 0.005 to 0.030 mg/kg). A notably higher level of contamination with heavy metals was noted in the analysed samples of herbs and spices (0.005–5.680 mg/kg), compared to samples of tea and coffee (0.005–0.791 mg/kg). According to the guidelines of the World Health Organisation (WHO) concerning the limits of contamination of samples of herbal raw materials with heavy metals, lead levels exceeding the limits were only noted in 24 samples of herbs (18%). In all of the analysed samples of spices, tea, and coffee, no instances of exceeded limits were noted for any of the analysed heavy metals. The values of TTHQmax (in relation to the consumption of the analysed products) were as follows: up to 4.23 × 10 −2 for spices, up to 2.51 × 10 −1 for herbs, up to 4.03 × 10 −2 for China tea, and up to 1.25 × 10 −1 for roasted coffee beans. As the value of THQ ≤1, there is no probability of the appearance of undesirable effects related to the consumption of the analysed group of raw materials and products of plant origin. The CR value for As (max. value) was 1.29 × 10 −5 , which is lower than the maximum acceptable level of 1 × 10 −4 suggested by United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA).

Suggested Citation

  • Grażyna Kowalska, 2021. "The Safety Assessment of Toxic Metals in Commonly Used Herbs, Spices, Tea, and Coffee in Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-19, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:11:p:5779-:d:563820
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/11/5779/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/11/5779/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agnieszka Fischer & Barbara Brodziak-Dopierała & Krzysztof Loska & Jerzy Stojko, 2017. "The Assessment of Toxic Metals in Plants Used in Cosmetics and Cosmetology," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-12, October.
    2. Chudy, Sylwia, 2014. "Rozwój rynku kawy i zmiany w jej konsumpcji wśród Polaków," Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland, vol. 34(4), December.
    3. Jian Zhang & Ruidong Yang & Rong Chen & Yishu Peng & Xuefeng Wen & Lei Gao, 2018. "Accumulation of Heavy Metals in Tea Leaves and Potential Health Risk Assessment: A Case Study from Puan County, Guizhou Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juan Liu & Weihong Lu & Naiming Zhang & Dan Su & Ladu Zeer & Hongdie Du & Kelin Hu, 2021. "Collaborative Assessment and Health Risk of Heavy Metals in Soils and Tea Leaves in the Southwest Region of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-16, September.
    2. Aiman M. Bobaker & Intisar Alakili & Sukiman B. Sarmani & Nadhir Al-Ansari & Zaher Mundher Yaseen, 2019. "Determination and Assessment of the Toxic Heavy Metal Elements Abstracted from the Traditional Plant Cosmetics and Medical Remedies: Case Study of Libya," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-14, June.
    3. Yongqiang Ning & Bizheng Yang & Shaochen Yang & Jiaxin Ye & Junjie Li & Limin Ren & Zhifu Liu & Xiangyang Bi & Jinling Liu, 2023. "Application of Pb Isotopes and REY Patterns in Tracing Heavy Metals in Farmland Soils from the Upper-Middle Area of Yangtze River," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-13, January.
    4. Huijuan Yang & Yan Chen & Jennifer M. Shido & Randall T. Hamasaki & Wayne T. Iwaoka & Stuart T. Nakamoto & Haiyan Wang & Qing X. Li, 2022. "Potential Health Risk of Aluminum in Four Camellia sinensis Cultivars and Its Content as a Function of Leaf Position," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-9, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:11:p:5779-:d:563820. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.