IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i11p5501-d558942.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Australian Smokers’ Sensory Experiences and Beliefs Associated with Menthol and Non-Menthol Cigarettes

Author

Listed:
  • Serafino Mancuso

    (Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia)

  • Emily Brennan

    (Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia)

  • Kimberley Dunstone

    (Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia)

  • Amanda Vittiglia

    (Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia)

  • Sarah Durkin

    (Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia)

  • James F. Thrasher

    (Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA)

  • Janet Hoek

    (Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington 6140, New Zealand)

  • Melanie Wakefield

    (Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia)

Abstract

Many current smokers incorrectly believe that menthol cigarettes are less harmful, likely due to the biological and sensory effects of menthol, which can lead smokers to have favourable sensory experiences. In this study, we measured the extent to which Australian smokers associate certain sensory experiences with smoking menthol and non-menthol cigarettes, and their beliefs about how damaging and enjoyable they find cigarettes with each of these sensory experiences. A sample of 999 Australian 18–69-year-old weekly smokers was recruited from a non-probability online panel; this study focuses on the 245 respondents who currently smoked menthol cigarettes at least once per week. Current menthol smokers were four to nine times more likely to experience menthol rather than non-menthol cigarettes as having favourable sensory experiences, including feeling smooth, being soothing on the throat, fresh-tasting and clean-feeling. Menthol smokers perceived cigarettes with these favourable sensations as less damaging and more enjoyable than cigarettes with the opposite more aversive sensory experience. Efforts to correct these misperceptions about risk will likely require messages that provide new information to help smokers understand that these sensations do not indicate a lower level of risk. Banning menthol in tobacco products—as has recently been done in some nations—would also be a timely and justified strategy for protecting consumers.

Suggested Citation

  • Serafino Mancuso & Emily Brennan & Kimberley Dunstone & Amanda Vittiglia & Sarah Durkin & James F. Thrasher & Janet Hoek & Melanie Wakefield, 2021. "Australian Smokers’ Sensory Experiences and Beliefs Associated with Menthol and Non-Menthol Cigarettes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-13, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:11:p:5501-:d:558942
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/11/5501/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/11/5501/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. WHO Study Group on Tobacco Product Regulation (TobReg), 2016. "Advisory note: banning menthol in tobacco products," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt8td7w55n, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    2. John R Stevens & Abdullah Al Masud & Anvar Suyundikov, 2017. "A comparison of multiple testing adjustment methods with block-correlation positively-dependent tests," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-12, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sullivan HUE & Yannick LUCOTTE & Sessi TOKPAVI, 2018. "Measuring Network Systemic Risk Contributions: A Leave-one-out Approach," LEO Working Papers / DR LEO 2608, Orleans Economics Laboratory / Laboratoire d'Economie d'Orleans (LEO), University of Orleans.
    2. Hué, Sullivan & Lucotte, Yannick & Tokpavi, Sessi, 2019. "Measuring network systemic risk contributions: A leave-one-out approach," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 86-114.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:11:p:5501-:d:558942. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.