IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2020i1p50-d467200.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Training Preferences of School Food Service Staff Vary by Role in the School Nutrition Program

Author

Listed:
  • Leia Flure

    (Office of Extension and Outreach, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA)

  • Melissa Pflugh Prescott

    (Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA)

  • Whitney Ajie

    (Washington State Department of Health, Tumwater, WA 98501, USA)

  • Trinity Allison

    (Office of Extension and Outreach, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA)

  • Jennifer McCaffrey

    (Office of Extension and Outreach, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA)

Abstract

Professional development has been identified as a critical component for school nutrition professionals (SNPs) to successfully implement school meal standards in the United States. However, training needs may vary based on different factors. This study examined (1) the topics of highest priority for SNPs; (2) preferred learning methods; (3) where and when trainings should be conducted; and (4) whether responses differ according to important factors including position type, school locale (urban vs. rural), or job experience. Participants completed surveys that included questions on demographics and preferences for learning methods and training topics ( n = 492). Descriptive statistics characterized survey responses. Chi square tests assessed differences in learning method and training topic preferences by participant role, locale, and job experience; Cramer’s V assessed the strength of association for each chi square result. Qualitative responses to open-ended questions were analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis method. Nearly all training topic preferences were significantly different ( p < 0.001 using Bonferroni method) when stratified by role. Significant differences were also observed for school locale and years of experience, but to a lesser degree. There was less variation in learning method preferences across staff role. Qualitative results ( n = 93) identified three key themes related to training needs: role-specific trainings, innovative learning methods, and geographic access. The combination of quantitative and qualitative analysis indicate that professional development for SNPs should mostly be conducted in-person, be easily accessible, and include hands-on activities. Further, training should be tailored by job role and address situational barriers unique to the geographic area.

Suggested Citation

  • Leia Flure & Melissa Pflugh Prescott & Whitney Ajie & Trinity Allison & Jennifer McCaffrey, 2020. "Training Preferences of School Food Service Staff Vary by Role in the School Nutrition Program," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-19, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2020:i:1:p:50-:d:467200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/1/50/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/1/50/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Capogrossi, Kristen & You, Wen, 2013. "National School Lunch Program Menus: A Moral Hazard Problem," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 149701, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2020:i:1:p:50-:d:467200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.