IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i9p3037-d351150.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experiences of the Initial Phase Implementation of the STAMINA-Model in Perioperative Context Addressing Environmental Issues Systematically—A Qualitative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Erebouni Arakelian

    (Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, and AnOpIVA, Uppsala University Hospital, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden)

  • Therese Hellman

    (Department of Medical Sciences, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Uppsala University, 752 36 Uppsala, Sweden)

  • Magnus Svartengren

    (Department of Medical Sciences, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Uppsala University, 752 36 Uppsala, Sweden)

Abstract

(1) Background: Challenges in perioperative settings put demands on staff working with systematic work environment management. A support model, STAMINA (Structured and Time-effective Approach through Methods for an Inclusive and Active working life), was implemented in a hospital in Sweden, to help staff address environmental issues systematically. The aim was to describe the experiences of the initial phase of implementation of the adapted STAMINA model in perioperative context. (2) Methods: Qualitative individual interviews were held with 14 managers and employees (three men and 11 women). Data were analysed by systematic text condensation. (3) Results: Five themes were identified: Limited knowledge of the model and the implementation process; scepticism, lack of confidence in the model and a passive attitude; the model offered increased participation; the culture in the organization—to understand one’s role as employees and managers; and endurance and feedback are key factors for success in the implementation process. (4) Conclusions: Scepticism turned to positive attitude by recognising that the STAMINA model offered increased participation. In order to have successful implementation, the organisational culture must be taken into consideration by giving the employees increased responsibilities and timely feedbacks. Role description, goal definition, feedback, and sticking to one model are key factors for success.

Suggested Citation

  • Erebouni Arakelian & Therese Hellman & Magnus Svartengren, 2020. "Experiences of the Initial Phase Implementation of the STAMINA-Model in Perioperative Context Addressing Environmental Issues Systematically—A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-12, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:9:p:3037-:d:351150
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/9/3037/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/9/3037/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Therese Hellman & Fredrik Molin & Magnus Svartengren, 2019. "A Qualitative Study on Employees’ Experiences of a Support model for Systematic Work Environment Management," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-14, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Erebouni Arakelian & Sofia Paulsson & Fredrik Molin & Magnus Svartengren, 2021. "How Human Resources Index, Relational Justice, and Perceived Productivity Change after Reorganization at a Hospital in Sweden That Uses a Structured Support Model for Systematic Work Environment Manag," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Kari Kristinsson & Sigurdur Gudjonsson & Bryndis Kristjansdottir, 2023. "Tough Times Require Tough People: The Benefits of Grit for Reducing Employee Burnout," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(11), pages 1-8, June.
    3. Fredrik Molin & Sofia Åström Paulsson & Therese Hellman & Magnus Svartengren, 2021. "Can the Human Resources Index (HRI) Be Used as a Process Feedback Measurement in a Structured Support Model for Systematic Work Environment Management?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Susanna Perä & Therese Hellman & Fredrik Molin & Magnus Svartengren, 2021. "Development Work in Healthcare: What Supportive and Deterrent Factors Do Employees Working in a Hospital Department Experience in an Improved Work Environment?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-17, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Erebouni Arakelian & Sofia Paulsson & Fredrik Molin & Magnus Svartengren, 2021. "How Human Resources Index, Relational Justice, and Perceived Productivity Change after Reorganization at a Hospital in Sweden That Uses a Structured Support Model for Systematic Work Environment Manag," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Susanna Perä & Therese Hellman & Fredrik Molin & Magnus Svartengren, 2021. "Development Work in Healthcare: What Supportive and Deterrent Factors Do Employees Working in a Hospital Department Experience in an Improved Work Environment?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Fredrik Molin & Sofia Åström Paulsson & Therese Hellman & Magnus Svartengren, 2021. "Can the Human Resources Index (HRI) Be Used as a Process Feedback Measurement in a Structured Support Model for Systematic Work Environment Management?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Sofia Paulsson & Therese Hellman & Magnus Svartengren & Fredrik Molin, 2023. "A Quantitative Study on Employees’ Experiences of a Support Model for Systematic Work Environment Management in Swedish Municipalities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-14, February.
    5. Felipe Muñoz Medina & Sergio López Bohle & Sebastian M. Ugarte & Maria José Chambel & Erika Wall, 2022. "Employees Perceptions of Job Insecurity and Performance: A Qualitative Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-14, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:9:p:3037-:d:351150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.