IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i4p1349-d322707.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contextual and Psychosocial Factors Influencing the Use of Safe Water Sources: A Case of Madeya Village, uMkhanyakude District, South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Chanelle Mulopo

    (School of Nursing and Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Howard Campus, Durban 4001, South Africa)

  • Chester Kalinda

    (School of Nursing and Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Howard Campus, Durban 4001, South Africa
    Faculty of Agriculture and Natural resources, University of Namibia, Katima Mulilo Campus, Winela Road, Box 1096, Ngweze, Katima Mulilo, Namibia)

  • Moses J. Chimbari

    (School of Nursing and Public Health, College of Health sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Howard Campus, Durban 4001, South Africa)

Abstract

Background : Schistosomiasis is a public health problem that affects over 240 million people worldwide. It is mostly prevalent in tropical and sub-tropical areas among communities with limited access to clean water and adequate sanitation. This study was conducted in uMkhanyakude District in rural South Africa, where water resources are limited. In this community, individuals frequently come into contact with freshwater bodies for various reasons. The objective of the study was to identify critical contextual and psychosocial factors for behaviour change to reduce risk of schistosomiasis transmission in Madeya Village, uMkhanyakude district. Methods : Structured household interviews were held with 57 primary caregivers to assess their thoughts and attitudes towards collecting water from a safe source. We used the Risk, Attitude, Norm, Ability, and Self-regulation model (RANAS) to estimate the intervention potential for each factor by analysing differences in means between groups of current performers and nonperformers who use safe water sources. Results : The subscale vulnerability belonging to the risk factor on the RANAS was scored as low. Furthermore, attitudinal factors towards the use of safe water sources were found to be low. Ability factors (confidence in performance and confidence in recovery) towards the use of safe water sources were low as well, indicating that these factors should be the target of the intervention in the study area. Discussion : Based on this study, it is recommended that a community-based empowerment intervention strategy it appropriate. The strategy should prompt behavioural practice and public commitment, use persuasive language to boost self-efficacy and target younger low-income caregivers between 18 and 35 years of age.

Suggested Citation

  • Chanelle Mulopo & Chester Kalinda & Moses J. Chimbari, 2020. "Contextual and Psychosocial Factors Influencing the Use of Safe Water Sources: A Case of Madeya Village, uMkhanyakude District, South Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-11, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:4:p:1349-:d:322707
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/4/1349/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/4/1349/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Dreibelbis & Anne Kroeger & Kamal Hossain & Mohini Venkatesh & Pavani K. Ram, 2016. "Behavior Change without Behavior Change Communication: Nudging Handwashing among Primary School Students in Bangladesh," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-7, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hassan Vally & Celia McMichael & Claire Doherty & Xia Li & Gilbert Guevarra & Paola Tobias, 2019. "The Impact of a School-Based Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Intervention on Knowledge, Practices, and Diarrhoea Rates in the Philippines," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Celia McMichael, 2019. "Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) in Schools in Low-Income Countries: A Review of Evidence of Impact," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-21, January.
    3. Yolisa Nalule & Helen Buxton & Alison Macintyre & Por Ir & Ponnary Pors & Channa Samol & Supheap Leang & Robert Dreibelbis, 2021. "Hand Hygiene during the Early Neonatal Period: A Mixed-Methods Observational Study in Healthcare Facilities and Households in Rural Cambodia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Astrid Hasund Thorseth & Jennifer Lamb & Constancia Vimbayi Mavodza & Mandikudza Tembo & Anesu Petra Mushangari & Eddington Zinyandu & Thomas Heath & Sian White, 2024. "Using Wash’Em to Design Handwashing Programmes for Crisis-Affected Populations in Zimbabwe: A Process Evaluation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(3), pages 1-25, February.
    5. Hattaya Chutiphimon & Apinya Thipsunate & Atigun Cherdchim & Bootsarakam Boonyaphak & Panat Vithayasirikul & Patiphan Choothong & Swit Vichathai & Pitchayanont Ngamchaliew & Polathep Vichitkunakorn, 2020. "Effectiveness of Innovation Media for Improving Physical Distancing Compliance during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Quasi-Experiment in Thailand," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-10, November.
    6. Aaron Lawson & Marie Vaganay-Miller, 2019. "The Effectiveness of a Poster Intervention on Hand Hygiene Practice and Compliance When Using Public Restrooms in a University Setting," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-12, December.
    7. Tzikas, Alexandros & Koulierakis, George, 2023. "A systematic review of nudges on hand hygiene against the spread of COVID-19," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    8. Tarique Md. Nurul Huda & Tania Jahir & Sushobhan Sarker & Farzana Yeasmin & Abdullah Al Masud & Jesmin Sultana & Jyoti Bhushan Das & Fosiul Alam Nizame & Elli Leontsini & Abul Kasham Shoab & Laura H. , 2021. "Formative Research to Design a Child-Friendly Latrine in Bangladesh," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-19, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:4:p:1349-:d:322707. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.