IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i15p5544-d392669.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Connecting at Local Level: Exploring Opportunities for Future Design of Technology to Support Social Connections in Age-friendly Communities

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer Liddle

    (Population Health Sciences Institute, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 5PL, UK
    Open Lab, Newcastle Helix, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 5TG, UK)

  • Nicole Pitcher

    (Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, 75004 Paris, France)

  • Kyle Montague

    (Open Lab, Newcastle Helix, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 5TG, UK)

  • Barbara Hanratty

    (Population Health Sciences Institute, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 5PL, UK)

  • Holly Standing

    (Department of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Coach Lane Campus East, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7XA, UK)

  • Thomas Scharf

    (Population Health Sciences Institute, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 5PL, UK)

Abstract

Social connectedness in later life is an important dimension of an age-friendly community, with associated implications for individual health and wellbeing. In contrast with prior efforts focusing on connections at a distance or online communities where the digital technology is the interface, we explore the design opportunities and role of technology for connectedness within a geographically local community context. We present findings from interviews with 22 older adults and a linked ideation workshop. Our analysis identified shared concerns and negative perceptions around local relationships, connections and characteristics of the geographical area. However, local connectedness through technology was largely absent from day-to-day life and even perceived as contributing to disconnection. By uncovering how older adults use and perceive technology in their social lives and combining these findings with their ideas for improving local connections, we highlight the need for thoughtful consideration of the role of technology in optimising social connections within communities. Our research highlights a need for design work to understand the specifics of the local context and reduce emphasis on technology as the interface between people. We introduce an amended definition—‘underpinned by a commitment to respect and social inclusion, an age-friendly community is engaged in a strategic and ongoing process to facilitate active ageing by optimising the community’s physical, social and digital environments and its supporting infrastructure’—to conceptualise our approach. We conclude by suggesting areas for future work in developing digitally connected age-friendly communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer Liddle & Nicole Pitcher & Kyle Montague & Barbara Hanratty & Holly Standing & Thomas Scharf, 2020. "Connecting at Local Level: Exploring Opportunities for Future Design of Technology to Support Social Connections in Age-friendly Communities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-25, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:15:p:5544-:d:392669
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/15/5544/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/15/5544/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tina ten Bruggencate & Katrien G. Luijkx & Janienke Sturm, 2019. "Friends or Frenemies? The Role of Social Technology in the Lives of Older People," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-15, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joost van Hoof & Hannah R. Marston, 2021. "Age-Friendly Cities and Communities: State of the Art and Future Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Melanie Davern & Rachel Winterton & Kathleen Brasher & Geoff Woolcock, 2020. "How Can the Lived Environment Support Healthy Ageing? A Spatial Indicators Framework for the Assessment of Age-Friendly Communities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Carmen Llorente-Barroso & Olga Kolotouchkina & Luis Mañas-Viniegra, 2021. "The Enabling Role of ICT to Mitigate the Negative Effects of Emotional and Social Loneliness of the Elderly during COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Arlind Reuter & Jennifer Liddle & Thomas Scharf, 2020. "Digitalising the Age-Friendly City: Insights from Participatory Action Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-18, November.
    5. Belinda Paulovich & Sonja Pedell & Erica Tandori & Jeanie Beh, 2022. "Weaving Social Connectivity into the Community Fabric: Exploring Older Adult’s Relationships to Technology and Place," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-13, July.
    6. Aisling Flynn & Marguerite Barry & Wei Qi Koh & Gearóid Reilly & Attracta Brennan & Sam Redfern & Dympna Casey, 2022. "Introducing and Familiarising Older Adults Living with Dementia and Their Caregivers to Virtual Reality," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-22, December.
    7. Hannah R. Marston & Kelly Niles-Yokum & Paula Alexandra Silva, 2021. "A Commentary on Blue Zones ® : A Critical Review of Age-Friendly Environments in the 21st Century and Beyond," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-33, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katrien Luijkx & Leonieke van Boekel & Meriam Janssen & Marjolein Verbiest & Annerieke Stoop, 2020. "The Academic Collaborative Center Older Adults: A Description of Co-Creation between Science, Care Practice and Education with the Aim to Contribute to Person-Centered Care for Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Xiaoyun Liu & Ka-Yin Chau & Xiaoxiao Liu & Yan Wan, 2023. "The Progress of Smart Elderly Care Research: A Scientometric Analysis Based on CNKI and WOS," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-21, January.
    3. Sophie N. Gaber & Louise Nygård & Anna Brorsson & Anders Kottorp & Georgina Charlesworth & Sarah Wallcook & Camilla Malinowsky, 2020. "Social Participation in Relation to Technology Use and Social Deprivation: A Mixed Methods Study Among Older People with and without Dementia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-19, June.
    4. Mabel Ho & Eleanor Pullenayegum & Esme Fuller-Thomson, 2023. "Is Social Participation Associated with Successful Aging among Older Canadians? Findings from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(12), pages 1-15, June.
    5. Joost van Hoof & Deirdre M. Beneken genaamd Kolmer & Erwin de Vlugt & Sanne I. de Vries, 2019. "Quality of Life: The Interplay between Human Behaviour, Technology and the Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-7, December.
    6. Viktoria Hoel & Eliva Atieno Ambugo & Karin Wolf-Ostermann, 2022. "Sustaining Our Relationship: Dyadic Interactions Supported by Technology for People with Dementia and Their Informal Caregivers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-18, September.
    7. Rose Calixte & Argelis Rivera & Olutobi Oridota & William Beauchamp & Marlene Camacho-Rivera, 2020. "Social and Demographic Patterns of Health-Related Internet Use Among Adults in the United States: A Secondary Data Analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-16, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:15:p:5544-:d:392669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.