IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i10p3527-d359621.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“You Do It without Their Knowledge.” Assessing Knowledge and Perception of Stealthing among College Students

Author

Listed:
  • Marwa Ahmad

    (Department of Health Science & Human Ecology, California State University, San Bernardino, CA 92407, USA)

  • Benjamin Becerra

    (Department of Information & Decision Sciences, California State University, San Bernardino, CA 92407, USA)

  • Dyanna Hernandez

    (Department of Health Science & Human Ecology, California State University, San Bernardino, CA 92407, USA)

  • Paulchris Okpala

    (Department of Health Science & Human Ecology, California State University, San Bernardino, CA 92407, USA
    Center for Health Equity, California State University, San Bernardino, CA 92407, USA)

  • Amber Olney

    (Department of Health Science & Human Ecology, California State University, San Bernardino, CA 92407, USA)

  • Monideepa Becerra

    (Department of Health Science & Human Ecology, California State University, San Bernardino, CA 92407, USA
    Center for Health Equity, California State University, San Bernardino, CA 92407, USA)

Abstract

In recent years, the act of nonconsensual condom removal, termed stealthing, has become commonly discussed on social and print media; yet, little to no evidence exists on the current knowledge and perception of stealthing among young adults. As such, we assessed what college students know and feel regarding stealthing. We employed an exploratory mixed-method analysis where focus groups were followed by a quantitative survey. A qualitative assessment was conducted using grounded theory analyses and questions for a quantitative survey were developed based on emergent themes from focus groups. Quantitative data was analyzed using descriptive and bivariate analyses with alpha less than 0.05 to denote significance. Though limited knowledge exists, participants felt that stealthing was a violation of their privacy, trust, sexual consent, and their ability to make a health decision, and should be considered an assault. Participants noted stealthing may have become acceptable due to its popularity in social media and young adult culture, especially porn. We also found sex differences in the perception of stealthing being considered a sexual assault with lower rates among males as compared to females. Our results demonstrate that there is a need for health educators to assess the prevalence of such a behavior among college students and policy makers to assess the legal implications of nonconsensual condom removal.

Suggested Citation

  • Marwa Ahmad & Benjamin Becerra & Dyanna Hernandez & Paulchris Okpala & Amber Olney & Monideepa Becerra, 2020. "“You Do It without Their Knowledge.” Assessing Knowledge and Perception of Stealthing among College Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-11, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:10:p:3527-:d:359621
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/10/3527/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/10/3527/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sumayya Ebrahim, 2019. "I’m Not Sure This Is Rape, But: An Exposition of the Stealthing Trend," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(2), pages 21582440198, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Konrad Czechowski & Erin Leigh Courtice & Jonathan Samosh & Jared Davies & Krystelle Shaughnessy, 2019. "“That’s not what was originally agreed to”: Perceptions, outcomes, and legal contextualization of non-consensual condom removal in a Canadian sample," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-24, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:10:p:3527-:d:359621. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.