IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i16p2841-d256012.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparison of the Impact of Two Methods of Nutrition-Behavioral Intervention on Selected Auxological and Biochemical Parameters in Obese Prepubertal Children—Crossover Preliminary Study

Author

Listed:
  • Agnieszka Kozioł-Kozakowska

    (Department of Pediatrics, Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Institute of Pediatrics, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 30-663 Krakow, Poland
    Children’s University Hospital in Krakow, 30-663 Krakow, Poland)

  • Małgorzata Wójcik

    (Children’s University Hospital in Krakow, 30-663 Krakow, Poland
    Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Endocrinology, Chair of Pediatrics, Institute of Pediatrics, Jagiellonian University, Medical College, 30-663 Krakow, Poland)

  • Aleksandra Furtak

    (Children’s University Hospital in Krakow, 30-663 Krakow, Poland
    Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Endocrinology, Chair of Pediatrics, Institute of Pediatrics, Jagiellonian University, Medical College, 30-663 Krakow, Poland)

  • Dominika Januś

    (Children’s University Hospital in Krakow, 30-663 Krakow, Poland
    Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Endocrinology, Chair of Pediatrics, Institute of Pediatrics, Jagiellonian University, Medical College, 30-663 Krakow, Poland)

  • Jerzy B. Starzyk

    (Children’s University Hospital in Krakow, 30-663 Krakow, Poland
    Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Endocrinology, Chair of Pediatrics, Institute of Pediatrics, Jagiellonian University, Medical College, 30-663 Krakow, Poland)

Abstract

Obese children are exposed to short and long-term health consequences, such as dyslipidemia, hypertension and diabetes mellitus. For these reasons, the prevention and treatment of obesity in the pediatric population is a challenge for health care professionals. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether an intensive intervention based on diet and physical activity has a better impact on the auxological and biochemical parameters than standard care (intervention). The study included 20 children (six boys, 14 girls), of the mean age 8.9 (SD 1.4) before puberty. The participants were randomly assigned to two groups: Group I (starting treatment with intensive intervention), and II (starting treatment with standard intervention). After three months, the groups were switched. The comparison of the two interventions in the study group indicates a better effectiveness of intensive intervention in the improvement of anthropometric parameters and majority of biochemical ones (except for insulin concentration, HOMA IR index and LDL cholesterol). As the result of intensive intervention, the mean % of weight-to-height excess and hip circumference decreased significantly ( p < 0.005). Our results confirm that complex intervention based on systematic control visits, including personalized dietitian counselling and physician care, during the weight reduction process is more effective than a one-off standard visit.

Suggested Citation

  • Agnieszka Kozioł-Kozakowska & Małgorzata Wójcik & Aleksandra Furtak & Dominika Januś & Jerzy B. Starzyk, 2019. "A Comparison of the Impact of Two Methods of Nutrition-Behavioral Intervention on Selected Auxological and Biochemical Parameters in Obese Prepubertal Children—Crossover Preliminary Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-12, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:16:p:2841-:d:256012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/16/2841/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/16/2841/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiménez-Aguilar, Alejandra & Rodríguez-Oliveros, María Guadalupe & Uribe-Carvajal, Rebeca & González-Unzaga, Marco Aurelio & Escalante-Izeta, Ericka Ileana & Reyes-Morales, Hortensia, 2019. "Design of an educational strategy based on Intervention Mapping for nutritional health promotion in Child Care Centers," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1-1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:16:p:2841-:d:256012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.