IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i10p1800-d232939.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Determinants of Readiness for Professional Development Among Polish Nurses

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Bartosiewicz

    (Institute of Nursing and Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rzeszow, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland)

  • Edyta Łuszczki

    (Institute of Nursing and Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rzeszow, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland)

  • Andrzej Różański

    (Department of Labour Pedagogy and Andragogy, Faculty of Pedagogy and Psychology, Maria Curie-Sklodowska University, 20-004 Lublin, Poland)

  • Małgorzata Nagórska

    (Institute of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Rzeszow, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland)

Abstract

The continuous development of medical sciences and the introduction of new diagnostic methods and treatment with the use of specialized equipment means that the knowledge and skills acquired during university studies are no longer sufficient. This obliges nursing staff to raise their professional qualifications in order to provide the appropriate quality of medical services. The aim of the study was an analysis of nurses readiness for learning and development and factors determining this readiness. The study was conducted among 756 nurses. The questionnaire method adopted was the readiness of employees for learning and development (RELD) standardized questionnaire, and a questionnaire containing sociodemographic data of the respondents. For the subscales of readiness for learning and development, average results were predominant and concerned in particular the level of openness to changes in environment (A1 scale), and self-evaluation of past educational development (C5 scale). The readiness of the nurses examined to learn and develop was on an average level for all the subscales. Younger nurses, with a lower seniority, having higher education and additional qualifications had a higher readiness for learning and development.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Bartosiewicz & Edyta Łuszczki & Andrzej Różański & Małgorzata Nagórska, 2019. "Analysis of Determinants of Readiness for Professional Development Among Polish Nurses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-12, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:10:p:1800-:d:232939
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/10/1800/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/10/1800/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Weijie Xing & Linjun Ao & Huiting Xiao & Li Cheng & Yan Liang & Junqiao Wang, 2018. "Nurses’ Attitudes toward, and Needs for Online Learning: Differences between Rural and Urban Hospitals in Shanghai, East China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-11, July.
    2. Yeon Hee Kim & Young Sun Jung & Ja Min & Eun Young Song & Jung Hui Ok & Changwon Lim & Kyunghee Kim & Ji-Su Kim, 2017. "Development and validation of a nursing professionalism evaluation model in a career ladder system," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-14, October.
    3. Abbas Karami & Jamileh Farokhzadian & Golnaz Foroughameri, 2017. "Nurses’ professional competency and organizational commitment: Is it important for human resource management?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, November.
    4. Marta Gil-Lacruz & María Luisa Gracia-Pérez & Ana Isabel Gil-Lacruz, 2019. "Learning by Doing and Training Satisfaction: An Evaluation by Health Care Professionals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-13, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mercedes Rodríguez-Fernández & Juan Herrera & Carlos de las Heras-Rosas, 2021. "Model of Organizational Commitment Applied to Health Management Systems," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Carsten Müller & Kareem El-Ansari & Walid El Ansari, 2022. "Cross-Sectional Analysis of Mental Health among University Students: Do Sex and Academic Level Matter?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-14, October.
    3. Carlos Laranjeira & Filipa Pereira & Ana Querido & Marion Bieri & Henk Verloo, 2022. "Contributing Factors of Presenteeism among Portuguese and Swiss Nurses: A Qualitative Study Using Focus Groups," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Mustafa Mahooti & Parvaneh Vasli & Esmail Asadi, 2018. "Effect of organizational citizenship behavior on family-centered care: Mediating role of multiple commitment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Xueyan Cheng & Jing Chen, 2019. "An Exploration of Medical Education in Central and Southern China: Measuring the Professional Competence of Clinical Undergraduates," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-13, October.
    6. Margelytė-Pleskienė Aida & Vveinhardt Jolita, 2018. "The Quintessence of Organizational Commitment and Organizational Cynicism," Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, Sciendo, vol. 80(1), pages 67-88, December.
    7. Michela Cortini, 2019. "Learning by Doing…Errors! Comment on Gil-Lacruz et al. Learning by Doing and Training Satisfaction: An Evaluation by Health Care Professionals. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1397," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-2, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:10:p:1800-:d:232939. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.