IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i8p1753-d163912.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Trade-Off between Optimizing Flight Patterns and Human Health: A Case Study of Aircraft Noise in Queens, NY, USA

Author

Listed:
  • Zafar Zafari

    (Global Research Analytics for Population Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
    Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA)

  • Boshen Jiao

    (Global Research Analytics for Population Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA)

  • Brian Will

    (Queens Quiet Skies, P.O. Box 604888, Bayside, New York, NY 11360-4888, USA)

  • Shukai Li

    (Global Research Analytics for Population Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA)

  • Peter Alexander Muennig

    (Global Research Analytics for Population Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA)

Abstract

Objectives: Airports in the U.S. have gradually been transitioning to automated flight systems. These systems generate new flight paths over populated areas. While they can improve flight efficiency, the increased noise associated with these novel flight patterns potentially pose serious health threats to the overflown communities. In this case study, we estimated the monetary benefits relative to health losses associated with one significant change in flight patterns at LaGuardia Airport, year-round use of “TNNIS Climb”, which happened in 2012 as a result of flight automation in New York City. Prior to that, the use of the TNNIS Climb was limited to the U.S. Open tennis matches. Methods: We developed a decision-analytic model using Markov health states to compare the costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained associated with the limited use of TNNIS (old status quo) and the year-round use of TNNIS (current status quo). The TNNIS Climb increases airplane noise to above 60 decibels (dB) over some of the most densely populated areas of the city. We used this increased exposure to noise as the basis for estimating ground-level health using data from sound monitors. The total costs (including both direct and indirect costs), QALYs, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were estimated for the limited versus the year-round use of the TNNIS Climb. Results: The incremental lifetime costs and QALYs per person exposed to noise associated with the limited versus the year-round use of TNNIS was $11,288, and 1.13, respectively. Therefore, the limited use of TNNIS had an ICER of $10,006/QALY gained relative to the year-round of TNNIS. Our analyses were robust to changes in assumptions and data inputs. Conclusions: Despite increases in efficiency, flight automation systems without a careful assessment of noise might generate flight paths over densely populated areas and cause serious health conditions for the overflown communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Zafar Zafari & Boshen Jiao & Brian Will & Shukai Li & Peter Alexander Muennig, 2018. "The Trade-Off between Optimizing Flight Patterns and Human Health: A Case Study of Aircraft Noise in Queens, NY, USA," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-13, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:8:p:1753-:d:163912
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/8/1753/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/8/1753/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Postorino, Maria Nadia & Mantecchini, Luca, 2016. "A systematic approach to assess the effectiveness of airport noise mitigation strategies," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 71-82.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Trojanek, Radoslaw & Huderek-Glapska, Sonia, 2018. "Measuring the noise cost of aviation – The association between the Limited Use Area around Warsaw Chopin Airport and property values," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 103-114.
    2. Martin Brtnický & Václav Pecina & Tivadar Baltazár & Michaela Vašinová Galiová & Ludmila Baláková & Agnieszka Bęś & Maja Radziemska, 2020. "Environmental Impact Assessment of Potentially Toxic Elements in Soils Near the Runway at the International Airport in Central Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-14, September.
    3. Cherie Lu, 2017. "Is There a Limit to Growth? Comparing the Environmental Cost of an Airport’s Operations with Its Economic Benefit," Economies, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-13, November.
    4. Belén Payán‐Sánchez & José Antonio Plaza‐Úbeda & Miguel Pérez‐Valls & Eva Carmona‐Moreno, 2018. "Social Embeddedness for Sustainability in the Aviation Sector," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(4), pages 537-553, July.
    5. Jinlong Xie & Lei Zhu & Hsiao Mun Lee, 2023. "Aircraft Noise Reduction Strategies and Analysis of the Effects," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-19, January.
    6. Rodríguez-Díaz, A. & Adenso-Díaz, B. & González-Torre, P.L., 2019. "Improving aircraft approach operations taking into account noise and fuel consumption," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 46-56.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:8:p:1753-:d:163912. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.