IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v12y2015i12p14989-15378d59912.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Screening for Elevated Blood Lead Levels in Children: Assessment of Criteria and a Proposal for New Ones in France

Author

Listed:
  • Anne Etchevers

    (INSERM (National Institute of Health and Medical Research) U1085, Irset-Environmental and Occupational Health Research Institute, Rennes 35043, France)

  • Philippe Glorennec

    (INSERM (National Institute of Health and Medical Research) U1085, Irset-Environmental and Occupational Health Research Institute, Rennes 35043, France
    EHESP (School of Public Health), Sorbonne Paris Cité, Rennes 35043, France)

  • Yann Le Strat

    (InVS—French Institute for Public Health Surveillance, Saint Maurice 94415, France)

  • Camille Lecoffre

    (InVS—French Institute for Public Health Surveillance, Saint Maurice 94415, France)

  • Philippe Bretin

    (Ministry of Health, Directorate for Health, Paris 75350, France)

  • Alain Le Tertre

    (InVS—French Institute for Public Health Surveillance, Saint Maurice 94415, France)

Abstract

The decline in children’s Blood Lead Levels (BLL) raises questions about the ability of current lead poisoning screening criteria to identify those children most exposed. The objectives of the study were to evaluate the performance of current screening criteria in identifying children with blood lead levels higher than 50 µg/L in France, and to propose new criteria. Data from a national French survey, conducted among 3831 children aged 6 months to 6 years in 2008–2009 were used. The sensitivity and specificity of the current criteria in predicting blood lead levels higher than or equal to 50 µg/L were evaluated. Two predictive models of BLL above 44 µg/L (for lack of sufficient sample size at 50 µg/L) were built: the first using current criteria, and the second using newly identified risk factors. For each model, performance was studied by calculating the area under the ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curve. The sensitivity of current criteria for detecting BLL higher than or equal to 50 µg/L was 0.51 (0.26; 0.75) and specificity was 0.66 (0.62; 0.70). The new model included the following criteria: foreign child newly arrived in France, mother born abroad, consumption of tap water in the presence of lead pipes, pre-1949 housing, period of construction of housing unknown, presence of peeling paint, parental smoking at home, occupancy rates for housing and child’s address in a cadastral municipality or census block comprising more than 6% of housing that is potentially unfit and built pre-1949. The area under the ROC curve was 0.86 for the new model, versus 0.76 for the current one. The lead poisoning screening criteria should be updated. The risk of industrial, occupational and hobby-related exposure could not be assessed in this study, but should be kept as screening criteria.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne Etchevers & Philippe Glorennec & Yann Le Strat & Camille Lecoffre & Philippe Bretin & Alain Le Tertre, 2015. "Screening for Elevated Blood Lead Levels in Children: Assessment of Criteria and a Proposal for New Ones in France," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:12:y:2015:i:12:p:14989-15378:d:59912
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/12/14989/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/12/14989/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Apostolou, A. & Garcia-Esquinas, E. & Fadrowski, J.J. & McLain, P. & Weaver, V.M. & Navas-Acien, A., 2012. "Secondhand tobacco smoke: A source of lead exposure in US children and adolescents," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 102(4), pages 714-722.
    2. Joseph, A. & Spector, L. & Wickham, K. & Janis, G. & Winickoff, J. & Lindgren, B. & Murphy, S., 2013. "Biomarker evidence of tobacco smoke exposure in children participating in lead screening," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 103(12), pages 54-59.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. You Li & Jian Qin & Xiao Wei & Chunhong Li & Jian Wang & Meiyu Jiang & Xue Liang & Tianlong Xia & Zhiyong Zhang, 2016. "The Risk Factors of Child Lead Poisoning in China: A Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Giovanni S. Leonardi & Ekaterine Ruadze & Ayoub Saei & Adam Laycock & Simon Chenery & Helen Crabbe & Elizabeth Marchant & Irma Khonelidze & Lela Sturua & Paata Imnadze & Amiran Gamkrelidze & Michael J, 2023. "Identifying Sources of Lead Exposure for Children in the Republic of Georgia, with Lead Isotope Ratios," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(20), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Howard W. Mielke, 2016. "Editorial: Lead Risk Assessment and Health Effects," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-3, June.
    4. Marsela Tanaka & Konstantinos Petsios & Stavroula K. Dikalioti & Stavroula Poulopoulou & Vassiliki Matziou & Stamatios Theocharis & Ioanna D. Pavlopoulou, 2018. "Lead Exposure and Associated Risk Factors among New Migrant Children Arriving in Greece," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-10, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sònia Torres & Carla Merino & Beatrix Paton & Xavier Correig & Noelia Ramírez, 2018. "Biomarkers of Exposure to Secondhand and Thirdhand Tobacco Smoke: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-25, November.
    2. Mai Takagi & Atsushi Tanaka & Haruhiko Seyama & Ayumi Uematsu & Masayuki Kaji & Jun Yoshinaga, 2020. "Source Identification Analysis of Lead in the Blood of Japanese Children by Stable Isotope Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-13, October.
    3. Sinye Lim & Mina Ha & Seung-Sik Hwang & Mia Son & Ho-Jang Kwon, 2015. "Disparities in Children’s Blood Lead and Mercury Levels According to Community and Individual Socioeconomic Positions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, May.
    4. Clement Kleinstreuer & Yu Feng, 2013. "Lung Deposition Analyses of Inhaled Toxic Aerosols in Conventional and Less Harmful Cigarette Smoke: A Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-32, September.
    5. Jiahui Ma & Lailai Yan & Tongjun Guo & Siyu Yang & Chen Guo & Yaqiong Liu & Qing Xie & Jingyu Wang, 2019. "Association of Typical Toxic Heavy Metals with Schizophrenia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-12, October.
    6. Undarmaa Enkhbat & Ana M. Rule & Carol Resnick & Chimedsuren Ochir & Purevdorj Olkhanud & D’Ann L. Williams, 2016. "Exposure to PM 2.5 and Blood Lead Level in Two Populations in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-11, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:12:y:2015:i:12:p:14989-15378:d:59912. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.