IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v11y2014i3p2683-2697d33639.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Simple Tool for Diet Evaluation in Primary Health Care: Validation of a 16-Item Food Intake Questionnaire

Author

Listed:
  • Katri Hemiö

    (Department of Chronic Disease Prevention, National Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 30, FI-00271 Helsinki, Finland
    Development of Work and Organizations, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Topeliuksenkatu 41 a A, FI-00250 Helsinki, Finland)

  • Auli Pölönen

    (The Prevention Project of Diabetes and Cardiovascular Diseases, Pirkanmaa Hospital District, P.O. Box 2000, FI-33521 Tampere, Finland
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Kirsti Ahonen

    (Tampere University Hospital, P.O. Box 2000, FI-33521 Tampere, Finland
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Mikko Kosola

    (Department of Chronic Disease Prevention, National Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 30, FI-00271 Helsinki, Finland
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Katriina Viitasalo

    (Finnair Health Services, IF/67, 01053 Finnair, Finland
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jaana Lindström

    (Department of Chronic Disease Prevention, National Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 30, FI-00271 Helsinki, Finland
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

Our aim was to validate a 16-item food intake questionnaire (16-FIQ) and create an easy to use method to estimate patients’ nutrient intake in primary health care. Participants (52 men, 25 women) completed a 7-day food record and a 16-FIQ. Food and nutrient intakes were calculated and compared using Spearman correlation. Further, nutrient intakes were compared using kappa-statistics and exact and opposite agreement of intake tertiles. The results indicated that the 16-FIQ reliably categorized individuals according to their nutrient intakes. Methods to estimate nutrient intake based on the answers given in 16-FIQ were created. In linear regression models nutrient intake estimates from the food records were used as the dependent variables and sum variables derived from the 16-FIQ were used as the independent variables. Valid regression models were created for the energy proportion of fat, saturated fat, and sucrose and the amount of fibre (g), vitamin C (mg), iron (mg), and vitamin D (μg) intake. The 16-FIQ is a valid method for estimating nutrient intakes in group level. In addition, the 16-FIQ could be a useful tool to facilitate identification of people in need of dietary counselling and to monitor the effect of counselling in primary health care.

Suggested Citation

  • Katri Hemiö & Auli Pölönen & Kirsti Ahonen & Mikko Kosola & Katriina Viitasalo & Jaana Lindström, 2014. "A Simple Tool for Diet Evaluation in Primary Health Care: Validation of a 16-Item Food Intake Questionnaire," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:11:y:2014:i:3:p:2683-2697:d:33639
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/3/2683/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/3/2683/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jaana Lindström & Kirsikka Aittola & Auli Pölönen & Katri Hemiö & Kirsti Ahonen & Leila Karhunen & Reija Männikkö & Ulla Siljamäki-Ojansuu & Tanja Tilles-Tirkkonen & Eeva Virtanen & Jussi Pihlajamäki , 2021. "Formation and Validation of the Healthy Diet Index (HDI) for Evaluation of Diet Quality in Healthcare," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Noël C. Barengo & Tania Acosta & Astrid Arrieta & Carlos Ricaurte & Dins Smits & Karen Florez & Jaakko O. Tuomilehto, 2019. "Early Lifestyle Interventions in People with Impaired Glucose Tolerance in Northern Colombia: The DEMOJUAN Project," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-13, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:11:y:2014:i:3:p:2683-2697:d:33639. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.