IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v10y2013i6p2258-2270d26189.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Road Traffic Noise and Annoyance: A Quantification of the Effect of Quiet Side Exposure at Dwellings

Author

Listed:
  • Yvonne De Kluizenaar

    (TNO, Department of Urban Environment and Safety, P.O. Box 49, Delft 2600 AA, The Netherlands)

  • Sabine A. Janssen

    (TNO, Department of Urban Environment and Safety, P.O. Box 49, Delft 2600 AA, The Netherlands)

  • Henk Vos

    (TNO, Department of Urban Environment and Safety, P.O. Box 49, Delft 2600 AA, The Netherlands)

  • Erik M. Salomons

    (TNO, Department of Urban Environment and Safety, P.O. Box 49, Delft 2600 AA, The Netherlands)

  • Han Zhou

    (TNO, Department of Urban Environment and Safety, P.O. Box 49, Delft 2600 AA, The Netherlands)

  • Frits Van den Berg

    (Public Health Services (GGD), Municipality of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 2200, Amsterdam 1000 CE, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Previous studies indicate that residents may benefit from a “quiet side” to their dwellings. The influence of the level of road traffic noise exposure at the least exposed side on road traffic noise annoyance was studied in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Road traffic noise exposure was assessed at the most and least exposed façade ( L den,most and L den,least respectively) of dwellings for subjects in a population based survey (N = 1,967). It was investigated if and to what extent relative quietness at the least exposed façade affected the level of road traffic noise annoyance by comparing two groups: (1) The subgroup with a relatively quiet façade; (2) the subgroup without a relatively quiet façade (large versus small difference in exposure between most and least exposed façade; DIF ≥ 10 dB and DIF < 10 dB respectively). In addition, it was investigated if and to what extent L den,least affected the level of road traffic noise annoyance. Results indicate a significantly lower road traffic noise annoyance score at a given L den,most , in the subgroup with DIF ≥ 10 dB versus DIF < 10 dB. Furthermore, results suggest an effect of L den,least independent of L den,most . The estimated size of the effect expressed in an equivalent change in L den,most approximated 5 dB for both the difference between the two subgroups (DIF ≥ 10 dB and DIF < 10 dB), and for a 10 dB change in L den,least .

Suggested Citation

  • Yvonne De Kluizenaar & Sabine A. Janssen & Henk Vos & Erik M. Salomons & Han Zhou & Frits Van den Berg, 2013. "Road Traffic Noise and Annoyance: A Quantification of the Effect of Quiet Side Exposure at Dwellings," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-13, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:10:y:2013:i:6:p:2258-2270:d:26189
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/10/6/2258/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/10/6/2258/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Timothy Van Renterghem & Dick Botteldooren, 2012. "Focused Study on the Quiet Side Effect in Dwellings Highly Exposed to Road Traffic Noise," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Hester Booi & Frits Van den Berg, 2012. "Quiet Areas and the Need for Quietness in Amsterdam," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-21, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Theo Bodin & Jonas Björk & Jonas Ardö & Maria Albin, 2015. "Annoyance, Sleep and Concentration Problems due to Combined Traffic Noise and the Benefit of Quiet Side," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Alan Lex Brown & Irene Van Kamp, 2017. "WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: A Systematic Review of Transport Noise Interventions and Their Impacts on Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-44, August.
    3. Francisco Guijarro, 2019. "Assessing the Impact of Road Traffic Externalities on Residential Price Values: A Case Study in Madrid, Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Natalie Riedel & Heike Köckler & Joachim Scheiner & Irene Van Kamp & Raimund Erbel & Adrian Loerbroks & Thomas Claßen & Gabriele Bolte, 2018. "Home as a Place of Noise Control for the Elderly? A Cross-Sectional Study on Potential Mediating Effects and Associations between Road Traffic Noise Exposure, Access to a Quiet Side, Dwelling-Related ," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, May.
    5. Laure-Anne Gille & Catherine Marquis-Favre & Kin-Che Lam, 2017. "Partial and Total Annoyance Due to Road Traffic Noise Combined with Aircraft or Railway Noise: Structural Equation Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Sarah R. Payne & Neil Bruce, 2019. "Exploring the Relationship between Urban Quiet Areas and Perceived Restorative Benefits," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-25, May.
    7. Peter Lercher & Bert De Coensel & Luc Dekonink & Dick Botteldooren, 2017. "Community Response to Multiple Sound Sources: Integrating Acoustic and Contextual Approaches in the Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-34, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarah R. Payne & Neil Bruce, 2019. "Exploring the Relationship between Urban Quiet Areas and Perceived Restorative Benefits," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-25, May.
    2. Aggelos Tsaligopoulos & Stella Kyvelou & Nefta-Eleftheria Votsi & Aimilia Karapostoli & Chris Economou & Yiannis G. Matsinos, 2021. "Revisiting the Concept of Quietness in the Urban Environment—Towards Ecosystems’ Health and Human Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Yalcin Yildirim & Diane Jones Allen & Amy Albright, 2019. "The Relationship between Sound and Amenities of Transit-Oriented Developments," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-19, July.
    4. David Welch & Mark Reybrouck & Piotr Podlipniak, 2022. "Meaning in Music Is Intentional, but in Soundscape It Is Not—A Naturalistic Approach to the Qualia of Sounds," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Ferran Orga & Francesc Alías & Rosa Ma Alsina-Pagès, 2017. "On the Impact of Anomalous Noise Events on Road Traffic Noise Mapping in Urban and Suburban Environments," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Gunnar Cerwén & Frans Mossberg, 2019. "Implementation of Quiet Areas in Sweden," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, January.
    7. Natalie Riedel & Heike Köckler & Joachim Scheiner & Irene Van Kamp & Raimund Erbel & Adrian Loerbroks & Thomas Claßen & Gabriele Bolte, 2018. "Home as a Place of Noise Control for the Elderly? A Cross-Sectional Study on Potential Mediating Effects and Associations between Road Traffic Noise Exposure, Access to a Quiet Side, Dwelling-Related ," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, May.
    8. Theo Bodin & Jonas Björk & Jonas Ardö & Maria Albin, 2015. "Annoyance, Sleep and Concentration Problems due to Combined Traffic Noise and the Benefit of Quiet Side," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, January.
    9. Robert Thorne & Daniel Shepherd, 2013. "Quiet as an Environmental Value: A Contrast between Two Legislative Approaches," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    10. Francesco Aletta & Tin Oberman & Jian Kang, 2018. "Associations between Positive Health-Related Effects and Soundscapes Perceptual Constructs: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:10:y:2013:i:6:p:2258-2270:d:26189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.