IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i21p5719-d1783496.html

A Comparative Study on Nucleate Pool Boiling Heat Transfer Performance of Low-GWP R-1336mzz(Z) (SF33) Against High-GWP HT55 for Advanced Cooling Applications

Author

Listed:
  • Qadir Nawaz Shafiq

    (Department of Energy and Refrigerating Air-Conditioning Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 10608, Taiwan
    Research Center of Energy Conservation for New Generation of Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Sectors, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 10608, Taiwan)

  • Aqbal Ahmad

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan)

  • Kuo-Shu Hung

    (Green Energy & Environment Research Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Hsinchu 310, Taiwan)

  • Liang-Han Chien

    (Department of Energy and Refrigerating Air-Conditioning Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 10608, Taiwan
    Research Center of Energy Conservation for New Generation of Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Sectors, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 10608, Taiwan)

  • Chi-Chuan Wang

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan)

Abstract

The present investigation conducts a comparative analysis of the nucleate pool boiling heat transfer performance of two dielectric fluids, a low-GWP hydrofluoroolefin-based fluid (commercially known as Opteon™ SF33, referred to hereafter as SF33) and a perfluoropolyether-based fluid with a high GWP (commercially known as Galden R HT55, referred to hereafter as HT55) under atmospheric pressure conditions. Pool boiling experiments and visual observations were performed to assess essential performance parameters, such as critical heat flux, heat transfer coefficient, and boiling dynamics. SF33 exhibits enhanced heat transfer performance, achieving markedly higher heat transfer coefficient values at all the heat flux levels and attaining superior critical heat flux relative to HT55. The results show that SF33 provides a consistently higher heat transfer coefficient, reaching approximately 12 W/m 2 ·K at maximum heat flux, compared to only 6 W/m 2 ·K for HT55, representing nearly a 100% improvement. The visual observations indicated that reduced surface tension and increased latent heat of vaporization of SF33 facilitate more frequent bubble nucleation and smaller bubble departure, thereby enhancing its boiling performance. Properties of SF33 render it a superior candidate for high-performance cooling systems in data centers and power electronics. The study concludes that SF33 is a more efficient and adaptable fluid for next-generation cooling systems, providing superior heat dissipation and energy efficiency relative to HT55.

Suggested Citation

  • Qadir Nawaz Shafiq & Aqbal Ahmad & Kuo-Shu Hung & Liang-Han Chien & Chi-Chuan Wang, 2025. "A Comparative Study on Nucleate Pool Boiling Heat Transfer Performance of Low-GWP R-1336mzz(Z) (SF33) Against High-GWP HT55 for Advanced Cooling Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-15, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:21:p:5719-:d:1783496
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/21/5719/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/21/5719/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:21:p:5719-:d:1783496. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.