Author
Listed:
- Ramesh Kumar Behara
(Electrical, Electronic, and Computer Engineering, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4041, South Africa)
- Akshay Kumar Saha
(Electrical, Electronic, and Computer Engineering, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4041, South Africa)
Abstract
As the deployment of wind energy systems continues to rise globally, ensuring the reliability and efficiency of grid-connected Doubly Fed Induction Generator (DFIG) wind turbines has become increasingly critical. Two core challenges faced by these systems include fault diagnosis in power electronic converters and accurate prediction of wind conditions for adaptive power control. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have introduced powerful tools for addressing these challenges. This study presents the first unified comparative performance analysis of two deep learning-based models: (i) a Convolutional Neural Network-Long Short-Term Memory CNN-LSTM with Variational Mode Decomposition for real-time Grid Side Converter (GSC) fault diagnosis, and (ii) an Incremental Generative Adversarial Network (IGAN) for wind attribute prediction and adaptive droop gain control, applied to grid-integrated DFIG wind turbines. Unlike prior studies that address fault diagnosis and wind forecasting separately, both models are evaluated within a common MATLAB/Simulink framework using identical wind profiles, disturbances, and system parameters, ensuring fair and reproducible benchmarking. Beyond accuracy, the analysis incorporates multi-dimensional performance metrics such as inference latency, robustness to disturbances, scalability, and computational efficiency, offering a more holistic assessment than prior work. The results reveal complementary strengths: the CNN-LSTM achieves 88% accuracy with 15 ms detection latency for converter faults, while the IGAN delivers more than 95% prediction accuracy and enhances frequency stability by 18%. Comparative analysis shows that while the CNN-LSTM model is highly suitable for rapid fault localization and maintenance planning, the IGAN model excels in predictive control and grid performance optimization. Unlike prior studies, this work establishes the first direct comparative framework for diagnostic and predictive AI models in DFIG systems, providing novel insights into their complementary strengths and practical deployment trade-offs. This dual evaluation lays the groundwork for hybrid two-tier AI frameworks in smart wind energy systems. By establishing a reproducible methodology and highlighting practical deployment trade-offs, this study offers valuable guidance for researchers and practitioners seeking explainable, adaptive, and computationally efficient AI solutions for next-generation renewable energy integration.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:17:p:4725-:d:1742681. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.