IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i17p4515-d1732307.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on the Emission Characteristics of Pollutants During the Waste-to-Energy Process of Landfill Waste and Municipal Solid Waste

Author

Listed:
  • Zongao Zhen

    (State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization, Institute for Thermal Power Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China)

  • Xianchao Xiang

    (State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization, Institute for Thermal Power Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China)

  • Xiaodong Li

    (State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization, Institute for Thermal Power Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China)

Abstract

As landfill mining becomes more widely applied, growing attention is being paid to the waste-to-energy conversion of landfill waste. Co-disposal of landfill waste with municipal solid waste represents one of the primary strategies for achieving energy recovery of landfill waste. In this paper, the emission characteristics of pollutants were systematically analyzed during the co-disposal of landfill waste and municipal solid waste in a full-scale municipal solid waste incineration. The study investigated the formation patterns of toxic PCDD/Fs and gaseous pollutants under different co-disposal ratios of landfill waste (0%, 15%, 25%, 35%, and 45%). In total, 136 PCDD/Fs were analyzed to investigate the influence of co-disposal ratios on PCDD/F formation in both flue gas and fly ash. The influence of varying co-disposal ratios on the phase and elemental composition of fly ash was also investigated. Co-disposal led to a significant reduction in the toxic PCDD/F concentration at the boiler outlet, mainly attributed to the higher sulfur content of LW compared to MSW. With increasing co-disposal ratios, the annual emission amounts of toxic PCDD/Fs in fly ash significantly increased. The ∑PCDD/∑PCDF ratio in both flue gas of boiler outlet and fly ash also increased, indicating an enhancement of the precursor formation pathway, while the de novo synthesis pathway was relatively suppressed. The fly ash exhibited a high proportion of highly chlorinated dioxins (degree of chlorination: 7.19–7.23), likely due to their low saturated vapor pressure. According to the Hagenmaier congener distribution, high co-disposal ratios (25–45%) suppressed the chlorination of DD/DF in fly ash but promoted the formation of gas-phase PCDFs. Different co-disposal ratios significantly influenced both the emission concentrations and removal efficiencies of air pollutants, including NOx, SO 2 , and HCl. Although co-disposal did not alter the crystalline phase composition of fly ash, it led to an increased content of heavy metals such as Cu, Hg, and Pb.

Suggested Citation

  • Zongao Zhen & Xianchao Xiang & Xiaodong Li, 2025. "Study on the Emission Characteristics of Pollutants During the Waste-to-Energy Process of Landfill Waste and Municipal Solid Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-24, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:17:p:4515-:d:1732307
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/17/4515/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/17/4515/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Yuhao & Li, Aijun & Guo, Guangzhao & Zhang, Junwei & Ren, Yang & Dong, Lu & Gong, Lifang & Hu, Hongyun & Yao, Hong & Naruse, Ichiro, 2024. "Comparative life cycle assessment of organic industrial solid waste co-disposal in a MSW incineration plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yulin Wang & Xianzhong Mu & Guangwen Hu & Liyuchen Wang & Xueting Zhu, 2025. "Life Cycle Assessment-Based Analysis of Environmental and Economic Benefits in Construction Solid Waste Recycling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-32, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:17:p:4515-:d:1732307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.