Author
Listed:
- Shaolei Wang
(Key Laboratory of Unconventional Natural Gas Evaluation and Development in Complex Tectonic Areas, Ministry of Natural Resources, Guiyang 550009, China
Guizhou Engineering Research Institute of Oil & Gas Exploration and Development, Guiyang 550009, China
The Laboratory of Guizhou Province of Intelligent Development and Efficient Utilization of Energy, Guiyang 550009, China)
- Yu Xiong
(Key Laboratory of Coalbed Methane Resources & Reservoir Formation Process, Ministry of Education, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221008, China
School of Resources and Geosciences, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)
- Huazhou Huang
(Key Laboratory of Coalbed Methane Resources & Reservoir Formation Process, Ministry of Education, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221008, China
School of Resources and Geosciences, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)
- Shiliang Zhu
(China Coal Technology and Engineering Group Xi’an Research Institute Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710077, China)
- Junhui Zhu
(Shenhua Geological Exploration Co., Ltd., Beijing 100083, China)
- Xiaozhi Zhou
(Key Laboratory of Coalbed Methane Resources & Reservoir Formation Process, Ministry of Education, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221008, China
School of Resources and Geosciences, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)
Abstract
The multi-branch horizontal well for coalbed methane (CBM) is a core technical means to achieve efficient CBM extraction, and its productivity is jointly restricted by geological and engineering factors. To accurately grasp the main controlling factors of the productivity of multi-branch horizontal wells and provide a scientific basis for the optimized design of CBM development, this study takes Well W1 in the Wenjiaba Coal Mine of the Zhina Coalfield in Guizhou, China, as an engineering example and comprehensively uses three-dimensional geological modeling and reservoir numerical simulation methods to systematically explore the key influencing factors of the productivity of multi-branch horizontal wells for CBM. This study shows that coal seam thickness, permeability, gas content, and branch borehole size are positively correlated with the productivity of multi-branch horizontal wells. With the simulation time set to 1500 days, when the coal seam thickness increases from 1.5 m to 4 m, the cumulative gas production increases by 166%; when the permeability increases from 0.2 mD to 0.8 mD, the cumulative gas production increases by 123%; when the coal seam gas content increases from 8 m 3 /t to 18 m 3 /t, the cumulative gas production increases by 543%; and when the wellbore size increases from 114.3 mm to 177.8 mm, the cumulative gas production increases by 8%. However, the impact of branch angle and spacing on productivity exhibits complex nonlinear trends: when the branch angle is in the range of 15–30°, the cumulative gas production shows an upward trend during the simulation period, while in the range of 30–75°, the cumulative gas production decreases during the simulation period; the cumulative gas production with branch spacing of 100 m and 150 m is significantly higher than that with spacing of 50 m and 200 m. Quantitative analysis through sensitivity coefficients reveals that the coal seam gas content is the most important geological influencing factor, with a sensitivity coefficient of 2.5952; a branch angle of 30° and a branch spacing of 100 m are the optimal engineering conditions for improving productivity, with sensitivity coefficients of 0.2875 and 0.273, respectively. The research results clarify the action mechanism of geological and engineering factors on the productivity of multi-branch horizontal wells for CBM, providing a theoretical basis for the optimized deployment of well locations, wellbore structure, and drilling trajectory design of multi-branch horizontal wells for CBM in areas with similar geological conditions.
Suggested Citation
Shaolei Wang & Yu Xiong & Huazhou Huang & Shiliang Zhu & Junhui Zhu & Xiaozhi Zhou, 2025.
"Simulation Study on Key Controlling Factors of Productivity of Multi-Branch Horizontal Wells for CBM: A Case Study of Zhina Coalfield, Guizhou, China,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-20, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:17:p:4496-:d:1731318
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Ali Altowilib & Ahmed AlSaihati & Hussain Alhamood & Saad Alafnan & Sulaiman Alarifi, 2020.
"Reserves Estimation for Coalbed Methane Reservoirs: A Review,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-26, December.
- Hongrui Zhao & Yishan Pan & Jinguo Lyu & Yisheng Peng & Shixu Li, 2023.
"Effect of Pressure Relief Hole Spacing on Energy Dissipation in Coal Seam at Various Mining Depths,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-11, February.
- Tianyi Tan & Hui Zhang, 2021.
"Study on the Mechanical Extended-Reach Limit Prediction Model of Horizontal Drilling with Dual-Channel Drillpipes,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
- Qiyuan Bai & Bin Zhang & Xingzhi Ma & Shufeng Zhao & Jialin Fan & Yvbo Fan & Xuan Tang, 2025.
"Research on the Modification of the Coal Pore Structure by Indigenous Microbial Degradation,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-16, April.
- Reza Rezaee, 2022.
"Editorial on Special Issues of Development of Unconventional Reservoirs,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-9, April.
- Tim A. Moore & Mike C. Friederich, 2021.
"Defining Uncertainty: Comparing Resource/Reserve Classification Systems for Coal and Coal Seam Gas,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-35, September.
- Sergey Slastunov & Konstantin Kolikov & Andrian Batugin & Anatoly Sadov & Adam Khautiev, 2022.
"Improvement of Intensive In-Seam Gas Drainage Technology at Kirova Mine in Kuznetsk Coal Basin,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-12, January.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:17:p:4496-:d:1731318. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.