Author
Listed:
- Łukasz Brodzik
(Institute of Thermal Energy, Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Energy, Poznan University of Technology, 5 M. Sklodowska-Curie Square, 60-965 Poznan, Poland)
- Bartosz Ciupek
(Institute of Thermal Energy, Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Energy, Poznan University of Technology, 5 M. Sklodowska-Curie Square, 60-965 Poznan, Poland)
- Andrzej Frąckowiak
(Institute of Thermal Energy, Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Energy, Poznan University of Technology, 5 M. Sklodowska-Curie Square, 60-965 Poznan, Poland)
- Dominik Schroeder
(Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Energy, Poznan University of Technology, 5 M. Sklodowska-Curie Square, 60-965 Poznan, Poland)
Abstract
This study investigated the thermomechanical behaviour of the nozzle of a GTM 400MOD miniature turbojet engine during combustion of aviation kerosene and co-combustion of kerosene with hydrogen. Numerical analysis was based on experiments conducted on a dedicated test rig at engine speeds ranging from 31,630 rpm to 65,830 rpm, providing data on the temperature and dynamic pressure at the nozzle outlet. These data served as input to numerical analyses using the ANSYS Fluent, Steady-State Thermal, and Static Structural modules to evaluate exhaust gas flow, temperature distribution, and stress and strain states. The paper performed a basic analysis with additional simplifications, and an extended analysis that took into account, among other things, thermal radiation in the flow. The results of the basic analysis show that, at comparable thrust levels, co-firing and pure kerosene combustion yield similar nozzle temperature distributions, with maximum wall temperatures ranging from 978 K to 1090 K, which remain below the allowable limit of 1193 K (920 °C). Maximum stresses reached approximately 261 MPa, close to but not exceeding the yield strength of 316 stainless steel. Maximum nozzle deformation did not exceed 0.8 mm. Small dynamic pressure fluctuations were observed; For example, at 31,630 rpm, co-firing increased the maximum dynamic pressure from 1.56 × 104 Pa to 1.63 × 104 Pa, while at 47,110 rpm, it decreased from 4.05 × 104 Pa to 3.89 × 104 Pa. The extended analysis yielded similar values for the nozzle temperature and pressure distributions. Stress and strain increased by more than 76% and 78%, respectively, compared to the baseline analysis. The results confirm that hydrogen co-firing does not significantly alter the nozzle thermomechanical loads, suggesting that this emission-free fuel can be used without negatively impacting the nozzle’s structural integrity under the tested conditions. The methodology, combining targeted experimental measurements with coupled CFD and FEM simulations, provides a reliable framework for assessing material safety margins in alternative fuel applications in small turbojet engines.
Suggested Citation
Łukasz Brodzik & Bartosz Ciupek & Andrzej Frąckowiak & Dominik Schroeder, 2025.
"Thermomechanical Analysis of the GTM 400 MOD Turbojet Engine Nozzle During Kerosene and Hydrogen Co-Combustion,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-18, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:16:p:4382-:d:1726386
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:16:p:4382-:d:1726386. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.