IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i14p3776-d1703216.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experimental Testing of Amplified Inertia Response from Synchronous Machines Compared with Frequency Derivative-Based Synthetic Inertia

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Fregelius

    (Division of Electricity, Department of Electrical Engineering, Uppsala University, Box 65, SE-751 21 Uppsala, Sweden
    Current address: AFRY, Täljstensgatan 4B, 749 40 Enköping, Sweden.
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Vinicius M. de Albuquerque

    (Division of Electricity, Department of Electrical Engineering, Uppsala University, Box 65, SE-751 21 Uppsala, Sweden
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Per Norrlund

    (Vattenfall AB, R&D Laboratories, Älvkarlebylaboratoriet, SE-814 70 Älvkarleby, Sweden
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Urban Lundin

    (Division of Electricity, Department of Electrical Engineering, Uppsala University, Box 65, SE-751 21 Uppsala, Sweden
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

A rather novel approach for delivery of inertia-like grid services through energy storage devices is described and validated by physical experiments and on-site measurements. In this approach, denoted “amplified inertia response”, an actual inertial response from a grid-connected synchronous machine is amplified. This inertia emulation approach is contrasted by what is called synthetic inertia, which uses a frequency-locked loop in order to extract the grid frequency. The synthetic inertia faces the usual input signal filtering challenges if the signal-to-noise ratio is low. The amplified inertia controller avoids the input filtering since it only amplifies the natural inertial response from a synchronous machine. However, rotor angle oscillations lead to filtering requirements of the amplified version as well, but on the output signal of the controller. Experimental comparisons are conducted both on the measurement output from the physical experiments in a microgrid and on analysis based on input from on-site measurements from a 55 MVA hydropower generator connected to the Nordic grid. In the specific cases compared, we observe that the amplified inertia version is the better method for smaller power systems, with large frequency fluctuations. On the other hand, the synthetic inertia method is the better in larger power systems as compared to the amplification of the inertial response from a real production unit.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Fregelius & Vinicius M. de Albuquerque & Per Norrlund & Urban Lundin, 2025. "Experimental Testing of Amplified Inertia Response from Synchronous Machines Compared with Frequency Derivative-Based Synthetic Inertia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-15, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:14:p:3776-:d:1703216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/14/3776/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/14/3776/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:14:p:3776-:d:1703216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.