IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i14p3728-d1701540.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis of Energy Efficiency and Position Stability of Sub-250 g Quadcopter and Bicopter with Similar Mass Under Varying Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Artur Kierzkowski

    (Department of Technical Systems Operation and Maintenance, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 27 Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego Str., 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Mateusz Woźniak

    (Department of Technical Systems Operation and Maintenance, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 27 Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego Str., 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Paweł Bury

    (Department of Technical Systems Operation and Maintenance, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 27 Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego Str., 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland)

Abstract

This paper investigates the energy efficiency and positional stability of two types of ultralight unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs)—bicopter and quadcopter—both with mass below 250 g, under varying flight conditions. The study is motivated by increasing interest in low-weight drones due to their regulatory flexibility and application potential in constrained environments. A comparative methodology was adopted, involving the construction of both UAV types using identical components where possible, including motors, sensors, and power supply, differing only in propulsion configuration. Experimental tests were conducted in wind-free and wind-induced environments to assess power consumption and stability. The data were collected through onboard blackbox logging, and positional deviation was tracked via video analysis. Results show that while the quadcopter consistently demonstrated lower energy consumption (by 6–22%) and higher positional stability, the bicopter offered advantages in simplicity of frame design and reduced component count. However, the bicopter required extensive manual tuning of PID parameters due to the inherent instability introduced by servo-based control. The findings highlight the potential of bicopters in constrained applications, though they emphasize the need for precise control strategies and high-performance servos. The study fills a gap in empirical analysis of energy consumption in lightweight bicopter UAVs.

Suggested Citation

  • Artur Kierzkowski & Mateusz Woźniak & Paweł Bury, 2025. "Comparative Analysis of Energy Efficiency and Position Stability of Sub-250 g Quadcopter and Bicopter with Similar Mass Under Varying Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-18, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:14:p:3728-:d:1701540
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/14/3728/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/14/3728/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mariusz Jacewicz & Marcin Żugaj & Robert Głębocki & Przemysław Bibik, 2022. "Quadrotor Model for Energy Consumption Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-33, September.
    2. Artur Kierzkowski & Bartłomiej Dziewoński & Krzysztof Kaliszuk & Mateusz Kucharski, 2025. "Evaluation of Light Electric Flying-Wing Unmanned Aerial System Energy Consumption During Holding Maneuver," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-22, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marcin Żugaj & Mohammed Edawdi & Grzegorz Iwański & Sebastian Topczewski & Przemysław Bibik & Piotr Fabiański, 2023. "An Unmanned Helicopter Energy Consumption Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-28, February.
    2. Rabab Benotsmane & József Vásárhelyi, 2022. "Towards Optimization of Energy Consumption of Tello Quad-Rotor with Mpc Model Implementation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-25, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:14:p:3728-:d:1701540. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.