Author
Listed:
- Nattapon Leeabai
(Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kasetsart University, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, Thailand)
- Natthakarn Sakaraphantip
(CES Solar Cells Testing Center (CSSC), Pilot Plant Development and Training Institute (PDTI), King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi (KMUTT), Thung Khru, Bangkok 10140, Thailand)
- Neeraphat Kunbuala
(Department of Industrial Engineering, School of Engineering, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Lat Krabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand)
- Kamonchanok Roongrueng
(Green Technology Research Co., Ltd. (GTR), Dindaeng, Bangkok 10400, Thailand)
- Methawee Nukunudompanich
(Department of Industrial Engineering, School of Engineering, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Lat Krabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand
Department of Mechanical Engineering (Energy Engineering Program), School of Engineering, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Lat Krabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand)
Abstract
This study presents an integrated methodology to assess and reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in institutional buildings by combining organizational carbon footprint (CFO) analysis with rooftop photovoltaic (PV) system simulation. The HM Building at King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang (KMITL), Thailand, was selected as a case study to evaluate carbon emissions and the feasibility of solar-based mitigation strategies. The CFO assessment, conducted in accordance with ISO 14064-1:2018 and the Thailand Greenhouse Gas Management Organization (TGO) guidelines, identified total emissions of 1841.04 tCO 2 e/year, with Scope 2 electricity-related emissions accounting for 442.00 tCO 2 e/year. Appliance-level audits revealed that classroom activities represent 36.7% of the building’s electricity demand. These findings were validated using utility data totaling 850,000 kWh/year. A rooftop PV system with a capacity of 207 kWp was simulated using PVsyst software (version 7.1), incorporating site-specific solar irradiance and technical loss parameters. Monocrystalline modules produced the highest energy output of 292,000 kWh/year, capable of offsetting 151.84 tCO 2 e/year, equivalent to 34.4% of Scope 2 emissions. Economic evaluation indicated a 7.4-year payback period, with a net present value (NPV) of THB 12.49 million and an internal rate of return (IRR) of 12.79%. The integration of verified CFO data with empirical load modeling and derated PV performance projections provides a robust, scalable framework for institutional carbon mitigation. This approach supports data-driven Net Zero campus planning aligned with Thailand’s Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) and carbon neutrality policies.
Suggested Citation
Nattapon Leeabai & Natthakarn Sakaraphantip & Neeraphat Kunbuala & Kamonchanok Roongrueng & Methawee Nukunudompanich, 2025.
"Integrated Assessment of Rooftop Photovoltaic Systems and Carbon Footprint for Organization: A Case Study of an Educational Facility in Thailand,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-14, May.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:10:p:2485-:d:1654136
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:10:p:2485-:d:1654136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.