Author
Listed:
- Qiang Liu
(College of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal University, Tianshui 741000, China
State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling 712100, China)
- Yifei Li
(College of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal University, Tianshui 741000, China)
Abstract
The global push toward digital transformation in education presents both opportunities and challenges for achieving sustainability goals. While digital technologies promise enhanced learning experiences and reduced environmental impacts, their implementation often overlooks complex trade-offs between pedagogical effectiveness, resource efficiency, and social equity. This study examines these critical intersections through a comprehensive investigation of geography education in Chinese secondary schools, comparing traditional, fully digital, and hybrid models across diverse urban, suburban, and rural contexts. Through a mixed-methods comparative design involving 262 participants (pilot) and 810 students (main study) and analysis of 17 geography textbooks, we assessed the environmental impacts, learning outcomes, economic viability, and social equity dimensions of each approach. Our findings reveal that thoughtfully designed hybrid models—which strategically combine digital tools for high-impact activities with traditional methods for local engagement—achieve optimal sustainability performance. These hybrid approaches reduced carbon emissions by 72.7% compared to traditional methods while improving learning outcomes and maintaining cost parity over five-year periods. Importantly, hybrid models demonstrated superior adaptability across different socioeconomic contexts, addressing equity concerns that purely digital approaches often exacerbate in resource-limited settings. This research challenges the prevailing technology-first narratives in educational reform, demonstrating that sustainable education transformation requires nuanced, context-sensitive integration strategies rather than wholesale digital transformation. The empirical evidence from this research provides robust support for achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals through educational innovation. The hybrid model’s 73% carbon reduction and simultaneous improvement of learning outcomes by 35% directly support SDG 4 (Quality Education) and SDG 13 (Climate Action). The 78% reduction in paper consumption advances SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), while successful implementation across urban, suburban, and rural contexts addresses SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities). These findings demonstrate that sustainable educational transformation can effectively balance technological innovation with environmental stewardship and social equity.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8478-:d:1754700. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.