IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i4p861-d1337824.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study of the Thermal and Hydraulic Performance of Porous Block versus Gyroid Structure: Experimental and Numerical Approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamad Ziad Saghir

    (Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture Science, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada)

  • Esa D. Kerme

    (Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture Science, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada)

  • Mahsa Hajialibabei

    (Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture Science, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada)

  • Heba Rasheed

    (Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture Science, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada)

  • Christopher Welsford

    (Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture Science, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada)

  • Oraib Al-Ketan

    (New York University in Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi M5B 2K3, United Arab Emirates)

Abstract

Various researchers in the field of engineering have used porous media for many years. The present paper studies heat enhancement using two different types of porous media. In the first type, porous metal foam media was used experimentally and numerically for heat extraction. The porous medium was replaced with a porous structure using the Gyroid model and the triply periodic minimum surfaces technique in the second type. The Darcy–Brinkman model combined with the energy equation was used for the first type, whereas Navier–Stokes equations with the energy equation were implemented for the second type. The uniqueness of this approach was that it treated the Gyroid as a solid structure in the model. The two types were tested for different heat fluxes and different flow rates. A comparison between the experimental measurements and the numerical solution provided a good agreement. By comparing the performance of the two types of structure, the Gyroid structure outperformed the metal foam for heat extraction and uniformity of the temperature distribution. Despite an 18% increase in the pressure drop in the presence of the Gyroid structure, the performance evaluation criteria for the Gyroid are more significant when compared to metal foam.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamad Ziad Saghir & Esa D. Kerme & Mahsa Hajialibabei & Heba Rasheed & Christopher Welsford & Oraib Al-Ketan, 2024. "Study of the Thermal and Hydraulic Performance of Porous Block versus Gyroid Structure: Experimental and Numerical Approaches," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-26, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:4:p:861-:d:1337824
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/4/861/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/4/861/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:4:p:861-:d:1337824. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.