IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i5p2464-d1088036.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Method Selection for Analyzing the Mesopore Structure of Shale—Using a Combination of Multifractal Theory and Low-Pressure Gas Adsorption

Author

Listed:
  • Meng Wang

    (State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China
    Unconventional Oil and Gas Science and Technology Research Institute, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China)

  • Zhuo Li

    (State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China
    Unconventional Oil and Gas Science and Technology Research Institute, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China)

  • Zhikai Liang

    (State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China
    Unconventional Oil and Gas Science and Technology Research Institute, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China)

  • Zhenxue Jiang

    (State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China
    Unconventional Oil and Gas Science and Technology Research Institute, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China)

  • Wei Wu

    (Shale Gas Research Institute, PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gas Field Company, Chengdu 610056, China)

Abstract

Nitrogen adsorption experiments have been extensively applied to shale pore structure research and evaluation. The pore structure can be quantitatively characterized in accordance with the nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherm using various calculation models, whereas the results obtained using different models can more effectively indicate the pore characteristics of shale remains unclear. Further, there has not been any unified process in the optimization of calculation models for pore size distribution (PSD). In this study, the Barret–Joyner–Halenda adsorption (BJH-AD) and BJH desorption (BJH-DE) models were used with Longmaxi Formation shale as an example. Subsequently, the density functional theory (DFT) calculations were conducted on different shale lithofacies samples. Next, the pore structure parameters and heterogeneity obtained using different models were compared, and the consistency parameters of different models were obtained in accordance with Cronbach’s alpha. The results indicated that the pore structure parameters obtained using the BJH-AD model were underestimated since the macroscopic thermodynamic theory was not applicable to this study. The DFT model showed multiple peaks in the range of 1–10 nm, whereas the BJH-DE model had a significant artificial peak in the range of 3.8 nm due to the tensile strength effect, thus suggesting that the DFT model is more capable of characterizing the pores with a pore size 10 nm lower than the BJH model. The PSD curves generated using the three models exhibited multifractal characteristics, whereas the results of the heterogeneity achieved using different models were different. Moreover, the consistency of the results of different models can be studied in depth by combining Cronbach’s alpha with various heterogeneity parameters. The DFT model exhibited high consistency in pore structure parameters and pore heterogeneity, thus suggesting that the DFT method of N 2 is the optimal physical adsorption data analysis method in the shale mesoporous range. Accordingly, the nitrogen adsorption curve, the hysteresis loop shape, multifractal parameters, and Cronbach’s alpha were integrated to generate a working flow chart of the nitrogen adsorption model for N 2 -adsorption-model optimization.

Suggested Citation

  • Meng Wang & Zhuo Li & Zhikai Liang & Zhenxue Jiang & Wei Wu, 2023. "Method Selection for Analyzing the Mesopore Structure of Shale—Using a Combination of Multifractal Theory and Low-Pressure Gas Adsorption," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-27, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:5:p:2464-:d:1088036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/5/2464/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/5/2464/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:5:p:2464-:d:1088036. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.