IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i3p1300-d1047145.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Hybrid Analytical Model for the Electromagnetic Analysis of Surface-Mounted Permanent-Magnet Machines Considering Stator Saturation

Author

Listed:
  • Wenbiao Lu

    (College of Electrical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China)

  • Jie Zhu

    (College of Electrical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China)

  • Youtong Fang

    (College of Electrical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
    Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Electrical Machine Systems, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China)

  • Pierre-Daniel Pfister

    (College of Electrical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
    Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Electrical Machine Systems, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China)

Abstract

This article presents the process of building a hybrid analytical model (HAM) for surface-mounted permanent-magnet machines. The HAM couples a reluctance network (RN) model in the stator region with a magnetic scalar potential analytical model in the air gap and magnets regions. This hybrid model can deal with the slotting effect with straight teeth, and takes magnetic saturation into account in the stator iron material using the RN model. It is calculated under open-circuit and loaded conditions. The magnetic flux density, flux linkage, back electromotive force (EMF), and torque of the machines are also calculated. This hybrid model is compared with the subdomain method. It is also compared with the finite element method (FEM) both in terms of the size of the matrix that needs to be calculated and in terms of the torque error. We analyzed this method for two surface-mounted permanent-magnet machines, one with a symmetry factor of four and another with a symmetry factor of three. In both cases, HAM reduced the size of the matrix that needed to be solved compared to FEM. In the machine with a symmetry factor of three, when the matrix size of both FEM and HAM was around 1700 × 1700, the torque error of FEM was 2.62% compared to the high-mesh-density FEM simulation, while the torque error of HAM was only 0.17% compared to the same simulation. HAM also had significant advantages over the subdomain method, as it reduced the torque error from 16.8% to 0.08% in the case of high magnetic saturation. The HAM can, hence, play a significant role in the design and optimization of surface-mounted permanent-magnet machines, especially in cases where magnetic saturation is present.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenbiao Lu & Jie Zhu & Youtong Fang & Pierre-Daniel Pfister, 2023. "A Hybrid Analytical Model for the Electromagnetic Analysis of Surface-Mounted Permanent-Magnet Machines Considering Stator Saturation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-24, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:3:p:1300-:d:1047145
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/3/1300/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/3/1300/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ouagued, Sofiane & Amara, Yacine & Barakat, Georges, 2016. "Comparison of hybrid analytical modelling and reluctance network modelling for pre-design purposes," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 3-21.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:3:p:1300-:d:1047145. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.