IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i24p7948-d1295825.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Physics-Informed Neural Network Approach for Surrogating a Numerical Simulation of Fractured Horizontal Well Production Prediction

Author

Listed:
  • Taiyu Jin

    (National Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China)

  • Yang Xia

    (National Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China)

  • Haolin Jiang

    (School of Integrated Circuit Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (UESTC), Chengdu 611731, China)

Abstract

With the popularity of deep learning (DL), more and more studies are focusing on replacing time-consuming numerical simulations with efficient surrogate models to predict the production of multi-stage fractured horizontal wells. Previous studies on constructing surrogate models for the prediction of the production of fractured horizontal wells often relied on directly applying existing deep learning architectures without incorporating physical constraints into the model. When dealing with the large number of variables necessary for characterizing the properties of fractures, the input variables of proxy models are often oversimplified; meanwhile, lots of physical information is lost. Consequently, predictions are sometimes physically inconsistent with the underlying principles of the domain. In this study, by modifying the traditional Seq2Seq (LSTM–LSTM) deep learning architecture, a physics-informed encoder–decoder (PIED) architecture was developed to surrogate the numerical simulation codes for predicting the production of horizontal wells with unequal-length intersecting hydraulic fractures on a 2D plane. The encoder is a LSTM network, and the decoder consists of LSTM and fully connected layers. The attention algorithm is also applied in the Seq2Seq architecture. The PIED model’s encoder is capable of extracting the physical information related to fractures. And the attention module effectively passes on the most relevant physical information related to production to the decoder during the training process. By modifying Seq2Seq architecture, the decoder of the PIED incorporates the intermediate input, which is the constant production time, along with the extracted physical information to predict production values. The PIED model excels in extracting sufficient physical information from high-dimensional inputs while ensuring the integrity of the production time information. By considering the physical constraints, the model predicts production values with improved accuracy and generalization capabilities. In addition, a multi-layer perceptron (MLP) which is broadly used as a proxy model; a regular Seq2Seq model (LSTM–Attention–LSTM); and the PIED were compared via a case study, and their MAE values were shown to be 241.76, 184.07, 168.81, respectively. Therefore, the proposed model has higher accuracy and better generalization ability. In the case study, a comparative experiment was conducted by comparing LSTM–MLP (with an MAE of 221.50) and LSTM–LSTM to demonstrate that using LSTM as the decoder structure is better for predicting production series. Moreover, in the task of predicting production sequences, LSTM outperforms MLP. The Seq2Seq architecture demonstrated excellent performance in this problem, and it achieved a 48.4% reduction in MSE compared to MLP. Meanwhile, the time cost for build datasets was considered, and the proposed model was found to be capable of training in a small dataset (e.g., in the case study, 3 days were used to generate 450 samples for training.); thus, the proposed model has a certain degree of practicality.

Suggested Citation

  • Taiyu Jin & Yang Xia & Haolin Jiang, 2023. "A Physics-Informed Neural Network Approach for Surrogating a Numerical Simulation of Fractured Horizontal Well Production Prediction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-21, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:24:p:7948-:d:1295825
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/24/7948/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/24/7948/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:24:p:7948-:d:1295825. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.