IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i19p6817-d1247995.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Zirconium Redistribution in BISON EBR-II Models Using FIPD and IMIS Databases with Experimental Post Irradiation Examination

Author

Listed:
  • Kyle M. Paaren

    (Idaho National Laboratory, 2525 Fremont Ave, Idaho Falls, ID 83415, USA)

  • Spencer Christian

    (Idaho National Laboratory, 2525 Fremont Ave, Idaho Falls, ID 83415, USA)

  • Luca Capriotti

    (Idaho National Laboratory, 2525 Fremont Ave, Idaho Falls, ID 83415, USA)

  • Assel Aitkaliyeva

    (Idaho National Laboratory, 2525 Fremont Ave, Idaho Falls, ID 83415, USA)

  • Douglas Porter

    (Idaho National Laboratory, 2525 Fremont Ave, Idaho Falls, ID 83415, USA)

Abstract

Metallic fuels have seen increased interest for future sodium fast reactors due to their material properties: high thermal conductivities and advantageous neutronic properties allow for greater fission densities. One drawback to typical metallic fuels is zirconium redistribution, which impacts this advantageous material and its neutronic properties. Unfortunately, the processes behind zirconium migration behavior are understood using first principles, so before these fuels are implemented in future fast reactors, characterization and fuel qualification regimes must be completed. These activities can be supported through the use of robust modeling using the most accurate empirical models currently available to fuel researchers around the world. The tool that allows researchers to model this complex coupled thermo-mechanical behavior and nuclear properties is BISON. Additionally, BISON model parameters need to be compared against PIE measurements. The current work utilizes two fuel pins from EBR-II experiment X441 to optimize various model parameters, including porosity correction factor, thermal conductivity, phase transition temperature, and diffusion coefficient multipliers, before implementing the final model for seven fuel pins with differing characteristics. To properly evaluate the BISON simulations, the results are compared to PIE metallography data for each fuel pin, to ensure the zirconium redistribution is properly reflected in the simulation results. Six out of seven analyzed fuel pins demonstrate good agreement between the metallography images and BISON results, showing alignment of the Zr-rich, Zr-depleted, and moderately Zr-enriched zones at various axial heights along the fuel pins. Further work is needed to refine the model parameters for general pin use.

Suggested Citation

  • Kyle M. Paaren & Spencer Christian & Luca Capriotti & Assel Aitkaliyeva & Douglas Porter, 2023. "Comparison of Zirconium Redistribution in BISON EBR-II Models Using FIPD and IMIS Databases with Experimental Post Irradiation Examination," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-19, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:19:p:6817-:d:1247995
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/19/6817/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/19/6817/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kyle M. Paaren & Nancy Lybeck & Kun Mo & Pavel Medvedev & Douglas Porter, 2021. "Cladding Profilometry Analysis of Experimental Breeder Reactor-II Metallic Fuel Pins with HT9, D9, and SS316 Cladding," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-21, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dhulipala, Somayajulu L.N. & Shields, Michael D. & Chakroborty, Promit & Jiang, Wen & Spencer, Benjamin W. & Hales, Jason D. & Labouré, Vincent M. & Prince, Zachary M. & Bolisetti, Chandrakanth & Che, 2022. "Reliability estimation of an advanced nuclear fuel using coupled active learning, multifidelity modeling, and subset simulation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:19:p:6817-:d:1247995. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.