IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2021i1p144-d711544.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Socio-Economic Determinants for Biochar Deployment in the Southern Highlands of Tanzania

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Msumali Rogers

    (Institute of Resource Assessment, University of Dar es Salaam, Dar es Salaam P.O. Box 35091, Tanzania)

  • Mathias Fridahl

    (Centre for Climate Science and Policy Research, Department of Thematic Studies, Environmental Change, Linköping University, 58183 Linköping, Sweden)

  • Pius Yanda

    (Institute of Resource Assessment, University of Dar es Salaam, Dar es Salaam P.O. Box 35091, Tanzania)

  • Anders Hansson

    (Centre for Climate Science and Policy Research, Department of Thematic Studies, Environmental Change, Linköping University, 58183 Linköping, Sweden)

  • Noah Pauline

    (Institute of Resource Assessment, University of Dar es Salaam, Dar es Salaam P.O. Box 35091, Tanzania)

  • Simon Haikola

    (Department of Thematic Studies—Technology and Social Change, Linköping University, 58183 Linköping, Sweden)

Abstract

Biochar may contribute to both agricultural productivity and atmospheric carbon dioxide removal. However, despite the many potential upsides of adding biochar to amend carbon-depleted soils in sub-Saharan Africa, deployment is largely lacking. This paper explores the socio-economic factors that can explain tendencies to avoid action. Based on a survey of 172 farming households, key informant interviews, and focus group discussions in the Mbeya and Songwe regions of Tanzania, which were targeted for a biochar aid program in 2014, several socio-economic drivers behind the continued use of biochar deployment were identified in this follow-up study. A key deployment driver was the increased crop yields, perceived to be the result of adding biochar to soils, increasing yields from 1 metric ton per hectare to 3 metric tons per hectare. Food security and family income were cited as the main reasons to engage in biochar production and use. Climate change mitigation and increased resilience were other key reasons that motivated adoption. In terms of socio-economic factors, farmers with low education and income, the majority being males aged 40–60 years, contributed to low adoption rates in the study area. Respondents often cited the alternative usage of biochar feedstocks, lack of government involvement or extension services, traditions, and farming customs as the main constraints limiting biochar deployment.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Msumali Rogers & Mathias Fridahl & Pius Yanda & Anders Hansson & Noah Pauline & Simon Haikola, 2021. "Socio-Economic Determinants for Biochar Deployment in the Southern Highlands of Tanzania," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2021:i:1:p:144-:d:711544
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/1/144/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/1/144/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sebastian M. Scholz & Thomas Sembres & Kelli Roberts & Thea Whitman & Kelpie Wilson & Johannes Lehmann, 2014. "Biochar Systems for Smallholders in Developing Countries : Leveraging Current Knowledge and Exploring Future Potential for Climate-Smart Agriculture," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 18781, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hannah Larissa Nicholas & Keith H. Halfacree & Ian Mabbett, 2022. "Public Perceptions of Faecal Sludge Biochar and Biosolids Use in Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bär, Roger & Reinhard, Jürgen & Ehrensperger, Albrecht & Kiteme, Boniface & Mkunda, Thomas & Wymann von Dach, Susanne, 2021. "The future of charcoal, firewood, and biogas in Kitui County and Kilimanjaro Region: Scenario development for policy support," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    2. Bößner, Stefan & Xylia, Maria & Bilbao, Bibiana & Indriani, Siti N. & Laub, Moritz & Rahn, Eric & Virla, Luis D. & Johnson, Francis X., 2023. "Capacity gaps in land-based mitigation technologies and practices: A first stock take," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    3. Roger Bär & Albrecht Ehrensperger, 2018. "Accounting for the Boundary Problem at Subnational Level: The Supply–Demand Balance of Biomass Cooking Fuels in Kitui County, Kenya," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-32, February.
    4. Agus Haryanto & Wahyu Hidayat & Udin Hasanudin & Dewi Agustina Iryani & Sangdo Kim & Sihyun Lee & Jiho Yoo, 2021. "Valorization of Indonesian Wood Wastes through Pyrolysis: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-25, March.
    5. Ana Castro & Nilcileny Da Silva Batista & Agnieszka E. Latawiec & Aline Rodrigues & Bernardo Strassburg & Daniel Silva & Ednaldo Araujo & Luiz Fernando D. De Moraes & Jose Guilherme Guerra & Gabriel G, 2018. "The Effects of Gliricidia -Derived Biochar on Sequential Maize and Bean Farming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, February.
    6. Shiferaw Feleke & Steven Michael Cole & Haruna Sekabira & Rousseau Djouaka & Victor Manyong, 2021. "Circular Bioeconomy Research for Development in Sub-Saharan Africa: Innovations, Gaps, and Actions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    7. Isabel Teichmann & Claudia Kemfert, 2014. "Biokohle in der Landwirtschaft als Klimaretter?," DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus 47, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    8. Kiatkamjon Intani & Sajid Latif & Md. Shafiqul Islam & Joachim Müller, 2018. "Phytotoxicity of Corncob Biochar before and after Heat Treatment and Washing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Belle, Graham H. & Lopez, Francis B., 2014. "Turfgrass Growth And Soil Water Status In Response To Biochar Application," 50th Annual Meeting, July 7-11, 2014, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands 253320, Caribbean Food Crops Society.
    10. Otte, Pia Piroschka & Vik, Jostein, 2017. "Biochar systems: Developing a socio-technical system framework for biochar production in Norway," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 34-45.
    11. Anders Hansson & Simon Haikola & Mathias Fridahl & Pius Yanda & Edmund Mabhuye & Noah Pauline, 2021. "Biochar as multi-purpose sustainable technology: experiences from projects in Tanzania," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 5182-5214, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2021:i:1:p:144-:d:711544. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.