IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i23p8117-d694635.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantification of Uncertainty in CFD Simulation of Accidental Gas Release for O & G Quantitative Risk Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Fabrizio Pappalardo

    (Department of Energy, Politecnico di Milano, 20156 Milano, Italy)

  • Alberto Moscatello

    (Department of Energy, Politecnico di Torino, 10141 Torino, Italy)

  • Gianmario Ledda

    (Department of Energy, Politecnico di Torino, 10141 Torino, Italy)

  • Anna Chiara Uggenti

    (Department of Energy, Politecnico di Torino, 10141 Torino, Italy)

  • Raffaella Gerboni

    (Department of Energy, Politecnico di Torino, 10141 Torino, Italy)

  • Andrea Carpignano

    (Department of Energy, Politecnico di Torino, 10141 Torino, Italy)

  • Francesco Di Maio

    (Department of Energy, Politecnico di Milano, 20156 Milano, Italy)

  • Riccardo Mereu

    (Department of Energy, Politecnico di Milano, 20156 Milano, Italy)

  • Enrico Zio

    (Department of Energy, Politecnico di Milano, 20156 Milano, Italy
    Centre de Recherche sur les Risques et les Crises (CRC), MINES ParisTech, PSL Research University, 75272 Valbonne, France)

Abstract

Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) of Oil & Gas installations implies modeling accidents’ evolution. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is one way to do this, and off-the-shelf tools are available, such as FLACS developed by Gexcon US and KFX developed by DNV-GL. A recent model based on ANSYS Fluent, named SBAM (Source Box Accident Model) was proposed by the SEADOG lab at Politecnico di Torino. In this work, we address one major concern related to the use of CFD tools for accident simulation, which is the relevant computational demand that limits the number of simulations that can be performed. This brings with it the challenge of quantifying the uncertainty of the results obtained, which requires performing a large number of simulations. Here we propose a procedure for the Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) of FLACX, KFX and SBAM, and show its performance considering an accidental high-pressure methane release scenario in a realistic offshore Oil & Gas (O & G) platform deck. The novelty of the work is that the UQ of the CFD models, which is performed relying on well-consolidated approaches such as the Grid Convergence Index (GCI) method and a generalization of Richardson’s extrapolation, is originally propagated to a set of risk measures that can be used to support the decision-making process to prevent/mitigate accidental scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Fabrizio Pappalardo & Alberto Moscatello & Gianmario Ledda & Anna Chiara Uggenti & Raffaella Gerboni & Andrea Carpignano & Francesco Di Maio & Riccardo Mereu & Enrico Zio, 2021. "Quantification of Uncertainty in CFD Simulation of Accidental Gas Release for O & G Quantitative Risk Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:23:p:8117-:d:694635
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/23/8117/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/23/8117/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ke, Wen-Chyan & Chen, Hueiling & Lin, Hsiou-Wei William, 2019. "A note of techniques that mitigate floating-point errors in PIN estimation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:23:p:8117-:d:694635. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.