IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i18p5718-d633184.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Machine-Learning Approach to Identify the Influence of Temperature on FRA Measurements

Author

Listed:
  • Regelii Suassuna de Andrade Ferreira

    (Research Chair on the Aging of Power Network Infrastructure (ViAHT), Department of Applied Sciences (DSA), Université du Québec à Chicoutimi (UQAC), Saguenay, QC G7H 2B1, Canada)

  • Patrick Picher

    (Hydro-Québec’s Research Institute (IREQ), Varennes, QC J3X 1S1, Canada)

  • Hassan Ezzaidi

    (Research Chair on the Aging of Power Network Infrastructure (ViAHT), Department of Applied Sciences (DSA), Université du Québec à Chicoutimi (UQAC), Saguenay, QC G7H 2B1, Canada)

  • Issouf Fofana

    (Research Chair on the Aging of Power Network Infrastructure (ViAHT), Department of Applied Sciences (DSA), Université du Québec à Chicoutimi (UQAC), Saguenay, QC G7H 2B1, Canada)

Abstract

Frequency response analysis (FRA) is a powerful and widely used tool for condition assessment in power transformers. However, interpretation schemes are still challenging. Studies show that FRA data can be influenced by parameters other than winding deformation, including temperature. In this study, a machine-learning approach with temperature as an input attribute was used to objectively identify faults in FRA traces. To the best knowledge of the authors, this has not been reported in the literature. A single-phase transformer model was specifically designed and fabricated for use as a test object for the study. The model is unique in that it allows the non-destructive interchange of healthy and distorted winding sections and, hence, reproducible and repeatable FRA measurements. FRA measurements taken at temperatures ranging from −40 °C to 40 °C were used first to describe the impact of temperature on FRA traces and then to test the ability of the machine learning algorithms to discriminate between fault conditions and temperature variation. The results show that when temperature is not considered in the training dataset, the algorithm may misclassify healthy measurements, taken at different temperatures, as mechanical or electrical faults. However, once the influence of temperature was considered in the training set, the performance of the classifier as studied was restored. The results indicate the feasibility of using the proposed approach to prevent misclassification based on temperature changes.

Suggested Citation

  • Regelii Suassuna de Andrade Ferreira & Patrick Picher & Hassan Ezzaidi & Issouf Fofana, 2021. "A Machine-Learning Approach to Identify the Influence of Temperature on FRA Measurements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-14, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:18:p:5718-:d:633184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/18/5718/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/18/5718/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stefan Tenbohlen & Sebastian Coenen & Mohammad Djamali & Andreas Müller & Mohammad Hamed Samimi & Martin Siegel, 2016. "Diagnostic Measurements for Power Transformers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-25, May.
    2. Mehran Tahir & Stefan Tenbohlen, 2021. "Transformer Winding Condition Assessment Using Feedforward Artificial Neural Network and Frequency Response Measurements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-25, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yulong Wang & Xiaohong Zhang & Lili Li & Jinyang Du & Junguo Gao, 2019. "Design of Partial Discharge Test Environment for Oil-Filled Submarine Cable Terminals and Ultrasonic Monitoring," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Szymon Banaszak & Konstanty Marek Gawrylczyk & Katarzyna Trela, 2020. "Frequency Response Modelling of Transformer Windings Connected in Parallel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-13, March.
    3. Yunhe Luo & Xiaosong Zou & Wei Xiong & Xufeng Yuan & Kui Xu & Yu Xin & Ruoyu Zhang, 2023. "Dynamic State Evaluation Method of Power Transformer Based on Mahalanobis–Taguchi System and Health Index," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Patryk Bohatyrewicz & Szymon Banaszak, 2022. "Assessment Criteria of Changes in Health Index Values over Time—A Transformer Population Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-15, August.
    5. Alexandra I. Khalyasmaa & Pavel V. Matrenin & Stanislav A. Eroshenko & Vadim Z. Manusov & Andrey M. Bramm & Alexey M. Romanov, 2022. "Data Mining Applied to Decision Support Systems for Power Transformers’ Health Diagnostics," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(14), pages 1-25, July.
    6. Mehran Tahir & Stefan Tenbohlen, 2021. "Transformer Winding Condition Assessment Using Feedforward Artificial Neural Network and Frequency Response Measurements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-25, May.
    7. Álvaro Jaramillo-Duque & Nicolás Muñoz-Galeano & José R. Ortiz-Castrillón & Jesús M. López-Lezama & Ricardo Albarracín-Sánchez, 2018. "Power Loss Minimization for Transformers Connected in Parallel with Taps Based on Power Chargeability Balance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-12, February.
    8. Wenqi Ge & Chenchen Zhang & Yi Xie & Ming Yu & Youhua Wang, 2021. "Analysis of the Electromechanical Characteristics of Power Transformer under Different Residual Fluxes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-22, December.
    9. Christian Gianoglio & Edoardo Ragusa & Paolo Gastaldo & Federico Gallesi & Francesco Guastavino, 2021. "Online Predictive Maintenance Monitoring Adopting Convolutional Neural Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, August.
    10. Szymon Banaszak & Eugeniusz Kornatowski & Wojciech Szoka, 2021. "The Influence of the Window Width on FRA Assessment with Numerical Indices," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-18, January.
    11. Nuria Novas & Alfredo Alcayde & Isabel Robalo & Francisco Manzano-Agugliaro & Francisco G. Montoya, 2020. "Energies and Its Worldwide Research," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-41, December.
    12. Pedro J. Villegas & Juan A. Martín-Ramos & Juan Díaz & Juan Á. Martínez & Miguel J. Prieto & Alberto M. Pernía, 2017. "A Digitally Controlled Power Converter for an Electrostatic Precipitator," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-24, December.
    13. Christian Gianoglio & Edoardo Ragusa & Andrea Bruzzone & Paolo Gastaldo & Rodolfo Zunino & Francesco Guastavino, 2020. "Unsupervised Monitoring System for Predictive Maintenance of High Voltage Apparatus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, March.
    14. Mehran Tahir & Stefan Tenbohlen, 2023. "Transformer Winding Fault Classification and Condition Assessment Based on Random Forest Using FRA," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-16, April.
    15. Jing Wu & Kun Li & Jing Sun & Li Xie, 2018. "A Novel Integrated Method to Diagnose Faults in Power Transformers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-8, November.
    16. Qing Yang & Peiyu Su & Yong Chen, 2017. "Comparison of Impulse Wave and Sweep Frequency Response Analysis Methods for Diagnosis of Transformer Winding Faults," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, March.
    17. Lei Peng & Qiang Fu & Yaohong Zhao & Yihua Qian & Tiansheng Chen & Shengping Fan, 2018. "A Non-Destructive Optical Method for the DP Measurement of Paper Insulation Based on the Free Fibers in Transformer Oil," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-9, March.
    18. Javier Leiva & Rubén Carmona Pardo & José A. Aguado, 2019. "Data Analytics-Based Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization for Determination of Congestion Thresholds in LV Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, April.
    19. Bonginkosi A. Thango & Agha F. Nnachi & Goodness A. Dlamini & Pitshou N. Bokoro, 2022. "A Novel Approach to Assess Power Transformer Winding Conditions Using Regression Analysis and Frequency Response Measurements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-22, March.
    20. Michał Kunicki & Sebastian Borucki & Andrzej Cichoń & Jerzy Frymus, 2019. "Modeling of the Winding Hot-Spot Temperature in Power Transformers: Case Study of the Low-Loaded Fleet," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-17, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:18:p:5718-:d:633184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.